Okay I was wrong, in that it was reported that Hudds had 12,000 there. However ( ), I'm also certain that I read 6000 in RLE (a more objective paper ), around the same time, so might have to conduct a little research if I have some spare time at some point.
so wouldnt the league express have reported it too then ? or is what they say to be taken as gospel ?
Okay I was wrong, in that it was reported that Hudds had 12,000 there. However ( ), I'm also certain that I read 6000 in RLE (a more objective paper ), around the same time, so might have to conduct a little research if I have some spare time at some point.
You'd think the examiner would know more than the RLE in this instance
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 346 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum