Joined: Jan 27 2008 Posts: 387 Location: The promise land
I'm leaving out Crocker as IMO it's not happening:
Dowes V Fozzard Berrigan V Fisher Cusack V Vella Tickle V Newton Tough one to call IMO Radders V Galea offers much more with ball in hand Washbrook V Murrell too close to call i'd say.
are you mad murrell much better and newton much better agree with rest but as i say sts/leeds/bulls pack are much better with a few exceptions
Joined: Nov 13 2005 Posts: 1328 Location: west hull
Bighead wrote:me neither. every player in there is completely average, including the massively overhyped berrigan
you are a complete and utter fool, what you know about RL you could write on the back of a stamp!
Berrigan overhyped????? what fcuking planet are you on?? even the most blinkered HKR fan, would tell you the man oozes class, why dont you support some other sport, because obviously RL and Bighead, just dont mix
Paul124897 wrote:Dowes vs Burgess Berrigan vs Newton Cusack vs Scruton Tickle vs Menzies Crocker vs Morrison - Unable to call Radders vs Langley
Shows how weak the Hull pack is.
The Bradford pack has dominated both Hull KR and Huddersfield in consecutive weeks, but Bradford don't have the backs to follow through. Play those two packs against each other and Bradford would win in the go forward everytime - and 2 of those are 35 and 32 respectively.
Joined: Feb 09 2008 Posts: 9342 Location: King George Dock
hullkrforever wrote:I'm leaving out Crocker as IMO it's not happening:
Dowes V Fozzard Berrigan V Fisher Cusack V Vella Tickle V Newton Tough one to call IMO Radders V Galea offers much more with ball in hand Washbrook V Murrell too close to call i'd say.
are you mad murrell much better and newton much better agree with rest but as i say sts/leeds/bulls pack are much better with a few exceptions
Is that why Morgan is a huge fan of Washy and even tried to sign him?
"You don't have to be great to start, but to be great you have to start".
I saw Hull at Bridgend and thought their pack went well.
Dowes had one of the best games ive seen him have.
Berrigan got Hull back in the game.
Cusack was much improved on last year.
Radford went well
Tickle was outstanding
Washbrook was awful though and 18 Celtic points came through his shoddy defence.
On current form Murrell is ahead of Washbrook.
The signings give them a bit of depth and more so IF Crocker eventually gets the green light.
The Bradford fan was right though, their pack is probably the best in SL but their backs are dire
Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:I saw Hull at Bridgend and thought their pack went well.
Dowes had one of the best games ive seen him have. Berrigan got Hull back in the game. Cusack was much improved on last year. Radford went well Tickle was outstanding Washbrook was awful though and 18 Celtic points came through his shoddy defence. On current form Murrell is ahead of Washbrook.
The signings give them a bit of depth and more so IF Crocker eventually gets the green light. The Bradford fan was right though, their pack is probably the best in SL but their backs are dire
tbf, washy was carrying a hamstring injury through the game, hence him being missing from the catalan game, on full fitness, washy over murrell anyday imo
Joined: Feb 09 2008 Posts: 9342 Location: King George Dock
number 6 wrote:tbf, washy was carrying a hamstring injury through the game, hence him being missing from the catalan game, on full fitness, washy over murrell anyday imo
Imo Washy shouldn't of played in the first two games at all. I don't think he needed to. They should of let him rest his injury. I like Murrell the chav but he isn't as good as Washbrook.
"You don't have to be great to start, but to be great you have to start".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum