It's not my money I don't care. I mean oh my god we had to let Henry Fa'afili go to fit King under the cap!
All I care about is that I would rather have King than Carmont and I would guess that most sensible Wigan fans would too. After all Wigan were in for him first.
Now The Wire.
Rogues Gallery wrote:Wire - the enigma. They could finish top or eighth, who knows.
Joined: Jan 04 2003 Posts: 4957 Location: At home, listening to Elvis.
[quote="griswold"]King Piemon, you are so right as always
I agree. He is rubbish.
Instead of signing King, Monaghan, Hicks & Anderson I am so jealous Wigan signed Coley, Carmont, the Invisible Man & Mathers. Why can't we sign players of that calibre?
But then again, as Maurice said, we're not Wigan are we?[/quote]
And you never will be !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery.......
I will look to the moment, and miraculously, the future will take care of itself.
Radio 5 Live, Sat, April 14th, 2007,...Dave Whelan, "In Wigan, rugby will always be king"
'I was certain, positive, convinced, and yet..........unsure'
Joined: Dec 21 2004 Posts: 23178 Location: Greatness
It's amazing how people can give such a detailed view of somebody that they've only seen play on SKY so far, in these games he has scored 2 tries in just over 170 minutes of action.
Joined: Oct 30 2005 Posts: 6268 Location: Warrington UK
I have said since day one in my opinion King is overrated. When the discussion was going on preseason I stated then I felt Matt Cooper is the better centre and after that I feel Gasnier, Bell and Hodges are even better.
Having said that I think any centre playing on the left for us is on a downer to begin with. We still attack the right 7/10. On the other hand Gleeson has been fantastic up to now for us and having King on the other side certainly has spread the defences so to speak. Gives us that other option.
Is Carmont better than King? Never, is King overrated? I personally think so.
Lefty wrote:It's not my money I don't care. I mean oh my god we had to let Henry Fa'afili go to fit King under the cap!
All I care about is that I would rather have King than Carmont and I would guess that most sensible Wigan fans would too. After all Wigan were in for him first.
We were however pulled out because he proved to expensive and we couldn't
fit him under the cap. So made the more sensible move to sign George Carmont who is on a lot less than Matt King and so far his stats are far better than King's.
Rugby Union: When entertainment just isn't your thing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
