Joined: Oct 13 2004 Posts: 36084 Location: Poodle Power!
Wes Hooligan wrote:They are lucky that they are playing such a bad side. Wakey will get their @rses handed to them if they come up against a good team that are playing well.
Just as well we play Shudds twice then, another 4 easy points,
Didn't you have a match of your own to watch tonight?
Joined: Oct 13 2004 Posts: 36084 Location: Poodle Power!
Code13 wrote:wow, so many eager biting fishies.
usual suspects mind.
Oh I see, it's trolling when aimed at you but because he's one of yours it's fishing. Considerinf Shudds fans are the most sensitive in the game you suddenly seem awfully leniant, how conveniant, how typically two faced.
Joined: Aug 17 2003 Posts: 17226 Location: South Wales
vastman wrote:Oh I see, it's trolling when aimed at you but because he's one of yours it's fishing. Considerinf Shudds fans are the most sensitive in the game you suddenly seem awfully leniant, how conveniant, how typically two faced.
No one was trolling. Wakefield scored 8 tries, of those 3 were from kicks, one was an interception and two were soft tries where Ferguson barged over the line. That leaves two tries that took some creative play, Blaymire's second and George's try. Blaymire's was as much down to terrible defence as creativity on Wakefield's part although Martin did well to set it up, and I have already praised George's try. As I have said, Wakefield generally rely on kicks and poor defensive efforts to score, which is ok because on paper they don't have the players to break down other teams. I've already praised their kicking game, so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Are you trying to suggest that this is not the case and that Wakefield beat Warrington with flair and skill tonight?
King Street Cat wrote:Some might look at this as being harsh but I think it's fair. When are the Rugby League going to stop persisting with this fantasy expansion. If it hasn't worked by now, it never will! I'm all for reaching out to a wider audience with our game but not at the expense of historical clubs in the homelands.
Wes Hooligan wrote:No one was trolling. Wakefield scored 8 tries, of those 3 were from kicks, one was an interception and two were soft tries where Ferguson barged over the line. That leaves two tries that took some creative play, Blaymire's second and George's try. Blaymire's was as much down to terrible defence as creativity on Wakefield's part although Martin did well to set it up, and I have already praised George's try. As I have said, Wakefield generally rely on kicks and poor defensive efforts to score, which is ok because on paper they don't have the players to break down other teams. I've already praised their kicking game, so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Are you trying to suggest that this is not the case and that Wakefield beat Warrington with flair and skill tonight?
Joined: Aug 17 2003 Posts: 17226 Location: South Wales
Barry Clegg 2nd wrote::lol:
What is funny, the fact that you have absolutely no counter argument and are making yourself look a fool? I can see why that is funny for everyone else but why are you laughing?
King Street Cat wrote:Some might look at this as being harsh but I think it's fair. When are the Rugby League going to stop persisting with this fantasy expansion. If it hasn't worked by now, it never will! I'm all for reaching out to a wider audience with our game but not at the expense of historical clubs in the homelands.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 83 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum