Joined: Mar 11 2007 Posts: 5659 Location: Next to Ramsgate Sands c.1850 in West Hull
saints35 bulls0 wrote:As usual the answer is within the RFL Operational Rules (available on the RFL website).
In the Challenge Cup: "The visiting Club may request that advance sale tickets be issued and if requested shall be entitled to be provided, in order to sell at face value, up to 30% of all tickets made available for general sale to the public."
So if Hull get drawn away at Caravan Park in the CC, we have the right to take 3000 of our fans to Rovers 7000 home fans.
How angry they'd be to have to up the miserly 1500 odd they usually send for us to view from the South "stand" as it crumbles beneath into the Humber.
Which other stand would we get?
Philip Larkin wrote:
There ain’t no music East side of this city That’s mellow like mine is, That’s mellow like mine.
Joined: Mar 11 2007 Posts: 5659 Location: Next to Ramsgate Sands c.1850 in West Hull
meast wrote:that nice shiny new one with mod-con facilities at the other end??
The bouncy plastic one? We tend to ensure we pretty much fill that by hook or by crook anyway
saints35 bulls0 wrote: In the League: "The visiting Club may request that advance sale tickets be issued and if requested shall be entitled to be provided, in order to sell at face value, up to 10% of all tickets made available for general sale to the public."
Interesting. As we have kindly donated 3600 to our nearest and dearest for the upcoming derby as opposed to the obligatory 10% of 2400, I think our generosity should be repaid more graciously than Rovers' habitual return of favour by upping the price of the South "Stand" by £7 to £17 compared to the £10 charged to all other fans at all other games.
And they think we're bitter
Philip Larkin wrote:
There ain’t no music East side of this city That’s mellow like mine is, That’s mellow like mine.
Rover charge £20 to sit ,,,,,£17 to stand.....this applied to any part of the ground ,,,,,we then discount the south stand by £7 as we know when demand is not high enough no one with use this area ,,,,,so why should we discount this area when the demand for tickets for this area outstrips the capacity. Not like those friendly bods at the kc who admit they have upped the price for the derby game for the same reason ....as the two clubs seem to go for tit for tat silliness at the moment id expect the south end standing tickets may rise above £17 this year.
Cridling stubb xii member wrote:Rover charge £20 to sit ,,,,,£17 to stand.....this applied to any part of the ground ,,,,,we then discount the south stand by £7 as we know when demand is not high enough no one with use this area ,,,,,so why should we discount this area when the demand for tickets for this area outstrips the capacity. Not like those friendly bods at the kc who admit they have upped the price for the derby game for the same reason ....as the two clubs seem to go for tit for tat silliness at the moment id expect the south end standing tickets may rise above £17 this year.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Cridling stubb xii member wrote:Rover charge £20 to sit ,,,,,£17 to stand.....this applied to any part of the ground ,,,,,we then discount the south stand by £7 as we know when demand is not high enough no one with use this area ,,,,,so why should we discount this area when the demand for tickets for this area outstrips the capacity. Not like those friendly bods at the kc who admit they have upped the price for the derby game for the same reason ....as the two clubs seem to go for tit for tat silliness at the moment id expect the south end standing tickets may rise above £17 this year.
You need to look up how discounted pricing is defined by Trading Standards.
The pricing you describe doesn't qualify.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
So do i, you'll find it easier to sell your allocation of a 1,000 tickets next time you visit Craven Park.....1,700 seemed a little difficult for your massive army to shift last season
Big Spender wrote:So do i, you'll find it easier to sell your allocation of a 1,000 tickets next time you visit Craven Park.....1,700 seemed a little difficult for your massive army to shift last season
yeah but its all down to fans choice.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
meast wrote:spouting rubbish?
what by stating facts that you deluded lot cant handle
hull kr struggled to attract even 2,000 supporters for games for the last 15 years is fact hull kr brought less than 200 fan to the (then) mcalpine stadium in 2002 is fact huddersfield have consistently averaged bigger home crowds than hull kr in the last 10-15 years is fact
hope that helps you flower
....Anyway ( ), to the present:
- We have higher average home attendences then you - Fact
- We take more away on average then you - Fact
- We're now a bigger club then you - Fact
Hope this helps!
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 356 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
), to the present:
