Paul HHZ wrote:I can see all this for myself. Where is the evidence that Toulouse would be better? Do they have the crowds to enable them to spend more money on players, or are they going to be as reliant on the finances of a wealthy benefactor?
It's all well and good having a pit of money to dip into, whenever a club needs to sign a new player, but I think it's more important for clubs to be sustainable. What would happen if the pit of money dried up? I'm not convinced that Toulouse are more sustainable than Salford.
salford arent sustainable without their chairman
salford dont spend the full salary cap because they cant afford too.
without a new ground salford wont progress as a club
toulose werent rejected from SL due to their finances which were quite good
the feeling was to allow les cats more time to bed in and also that les cats were reputed to have poor finances.
ive got little doubt about toulose in SL next time