FORUMS FORUMS




  

Home Bradford Bulls Law Amendments 2019



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 11:30 am 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 22 2001
Posts: 32126
Location: The Corridor of Uncertainty
https://www.rugby-league.com/article/54 ... ments-for-

Looks like we're getting some of the law changes (interchange/free play) but not others (golden point/shot clock).

Any thoughts? I’m a fan of the reduction in the number of subs. I think that will potentially open up the game as players tire. It might also make it safer as the really huge guys have to slim down in order to remain effective, that could reduce the force of collisions.

The free play rule seemed to me not worth bothering with really – I don’t recall it making the game more exciting. As for the golden point I see no reason for it unless in a sudden death competition. In regular games a draw is often the fairest result.

I’ve yet to see a reason why we’re not adopting the shot clock for drop outs. Does anyone know why?
https://www.rugby-league.com/article/54 ... ments-for-

Looks like we're getting some of the law changes (interchange/free play) but not others (golden point/shot clock).

Any thoughts? I’m a fan of the reduction in the number of subs. I think that will potentially open up the game as players tire. It might also make it safer as the really huge guys have to slim down in order to remain effective, that could reduce the force of collisions.

The free play rule seemed to me not worth bothering with really – I don’t recall it making the game more exciting. As for the golden point I see no reason for it unless in a sudden death competition. In regular games a draw is often the fairest result.

I’ve yet to see a reason why we’re not adopting the shot clock for drop outs. Does anyone know why?






"If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them," - Wayne Bennett.

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 12:05 pm 
Club Coach
International Star
User avatar

Joined: Mar 04 2005
Posts: 5880
Location: Bradford
The game in this country wasn't skillful enough to make best use of the free play rule.
It was a nice idea but somehow always seemed to end up with teams just hoofing the ball down the field and hoping for the best.

Not sure of exact reasons but bringing a shot clock into the championship doesn't really make much sense when you consider how slow every aspect of the play is in general anyway. Fix up the ptb first, then we'll worry about drop outs!

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 12:38 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 22 2001
Posts: 32126
Location: The Corridor of Uncertainty
Nothus wrote:The game in this country wasn't skillful enough to make best use of the free play rule.
It was a nice idea but somehow always seemed to end up with teams just hoofing the ball down the field and hoping for the best.

Not sure of exact reasons but bringing a shot clock into the championship doesn't really make much sense when you consider how slow every aspect of the play is in general anyway. Fix up the ptb first, then we'll worry about drop outs!


I think clearing up the PTB is on the “too hard” pile. It needs a game-wide shake up. The shot clock would at least put an end to the time wasting at drop outs. I can’t see why the ref couldn’t just set a stop watch when the ball goes dead.






"If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them," - Wayne Bennett.

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 12:45 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 01 2002
Posts: 10969
Location: Bradbados
I don't actually think the rule itself is "too hard", to be fair, it's more that it's mixed with a number other aspects which control the balance between attack and defence. This balance is key, since if you allow really quick PTBs without compensating elsewhere you just help the attacking side too much and we'd end up with a game resembling basketball. So maybe, speed it up but insist they play the ball with the foot to keep the balance.






Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain

Build Bridges NOT Walls

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 1:16 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 22 2001
Posts: 32126
Location: The Corridor of Uncertainty
Bulliac wrote:I don't actually think the rule itself is "too hard", to be fair, it's more that it's mixed with a number other aspects which control the balance between attack and defence. This balance is key, since if you allow really quick PTBs without compensating elsewhere you just help the attacking side too much and we'd end up with a game resembling basketball. So maybe, speed it up but insist they play the ball with the foot to keep the balance.



Sorry, that's what I meant. There needs to be a game-wide agreement on what is to be policed more stringently so that refs aren't making inconsistent interpretations. "The right balance" is easily upset and this part of the game is so pivotal to how it's played. We don't want to end up with endless dummy half scooting or with wrestlemania. I actually think that refs have allowed too much to go over the past 10-20 years and this approach has got us where we are.






"If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them," - Wayne Bennett.

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:47 pm 
Player Coach
First Team Player

Joined: Nov 29 2008
Posts: 2395
Location: On the Star Ship Andromeda Hope Lives Again !!
but insist they play the ball with the foot to keep the balance.

As per the RFL Rules the PTB is a basic of the Game apply the Rules instead of ignoring them in the obsession with speed

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:09 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 01 2002
Posts: 10969
Location: Bradbados
Thing is they have used the notion of "making a genuine attempt to play the ball with the foot" as an escape route. To me this has always been a total charade, since a pro rugby player genuinely "attempting to play the ball with the foot" would do so 999 times out of 1000. For heaven's sake, the under nines could do it more often than many pro players have done over recent years.






Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain

Build Bridges NOT Walls

Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: Law Amendments 2019
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:50 pm 
International Star
International Star
User avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Posts: 7201
Not so much a rule change but interesting to see Leeds/Wakey playing with a steeden ball while we played with a Rhino ball. Guess Rhino's contract was just with the RFL so SL gone back to Steeden.

Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 





It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 4:45 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 4:45 am