Rogues Gallery wrote:The cap should go back to how it was proposed, a percentage of turnover.
That way a club that grows can have more to invest. Rugby League however has the tail wagging the dog.
The present system allows clubs to spend money they don't have.
If you have a system based on turnover then Leeds would be able to buy all the best players and pay them twice as much as any other club.
Also turnover as a raw measure is a very simple way of measuring a clubs ability to afford a higher wage structure.
For example club "A" could have a turnover of £4 million but have to pay their landlords £1 million to rent the stadium for a season.
club "B" has a turnover of £3.2 million but gets their stadium free from the council and pays no rent for it.
If we go under the 50% rule club A could spend more on players than club B, however in reality club B could actually better afford to spend more money on players than club A.