| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| RD 10 | London Broncos H https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=647386 |
Page 1 of 11 |
| Author: | Frosties. [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RD 10 | London Broncos H |
A win that keeps Rohan Smith in a job for another week, then we come up against a London side that are struggling in the super league. Possibly Newman and Handley back, but Momirovski coped an injury which hopefully isn't too be bad. Lumb has to play again after what was a good performance for him |
|
| Author: | Jrrhino [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
This won't happen because Rohan Smith doesn't have credentials to do it but I'd want this to be our team for next Friday. Edgell Lumb Roberts Martin McCormack Croft Sinfield Oledzki Ackers Goudemand Mcdonnell Ruan Smith Subs O'Connor Lisone T.N.W Littlewood Like I say I highly doubt we'll see the likes of Miller & Frawley dropped but that 17 is still more than good enough to beat London and it would allow our young talent to get a chance and stake a claim for a shirt. |
|
| Author: | KaeruJim [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
I would consider moving Miller to wing but I wouldn’t drop him. He had MoM performances in him and he needs to play back into form. I would drop Frawley and give Sinfield an early chance to stake his claim to partner Croft. I’d swap Sangare and Lisone too. Other than that, probably Ned McCormack in for Mom. Maybe Jack Smith but think Ned is a little ahead. |
|
| Author: | KaeruJim [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
Miller Lumb, McCormack, Martin, Roberts Croft, Sinfield Mik, Ackers, Lisone McDonnell, Goudemand Smith: Sangare, Ruan, O’Connor, Edgell |
|
| Author: | Trebor1 [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
Be interesting to see the attendance for this one. Hopefully plenty turn out but there’s a definite cloud over the club at present |
|
| Author: | Simmo71 [ Mon Apr 29, 2024 6:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
Be a shame if Momirovski is injured, he was probably having his best game for Leeds. And looked like he was already building a good relationship with Lumb. He's a good centre for a young winger to be outside. I also think Roberts is doing pretty well on the wing. He carries well and is a big, strong lad. Should we give him a go in the centre with Edgell on the wing? Keep Miller at FB, but he needs to be told to just do the basics, cut out the 7's stuff as it usually ends in mistakes. And definitely Sinfield for Frawley. But Smith won't do it. |
|
| Author: | Once were Loiners [ Mon Apr 29, 2024 7:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
I don't see much point in bringing in Sinfield if the pack plays like it has in most games and we continue to lack any kind of structure. Sinfield will look as bad as Frawley. |
|
| Author: | fanstanningley [ Mon Apr 29, 2024 7:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
KaeruJim wrote:I would consider moving Miller to wing but I wouldn’t drop him. He had MoM performances in him and he needs to play back into form. I would go Jack Smith over Ned due to having more size and pace to burn.I thought he did really well in the trial games.
I would drop Frawley and give Sinfield an early chance to stake his claim to partner Croft. I’d swap Sangare and Lisone too. Other than that, probably Ned McCormack in for Mom. Maybe Jack Smith but think Ned is a little ahead. |
|
| Author: | KaeruJim [ Mon Apr 29, 2024 7:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
I like Jack Smith, I think he has loads of potential. Amongst all the doom mongering, we do have some talent coming through as we've seen in the friendlies and since. |
|
| Author: | rugbyleague88 [ Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RD 10 | London Broncos (H) |
Its hard to predict the backs until we know if any players will be fit and returning. No disrespect to Roberts but Lumb should be ahead of him now at winger. He showed more in attack than Roberts has all season and thought he was slightly better with yardage. Roberts seems to always be stopped dead when trucking it out. Sinfield in for Frawley as at the very minimum, I would expect some of his kicks not to go straight down the back three's throats. I would just emphasise to Sinfield to really focus on his defence and make sure he misses nothing. |
|
| Page 1 of 11 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|