Joined: Aug 02 2002 Posts: 7259 Location: Wakefield but near to Leeds!
Sinfield should be given one of the slots with maybe Martin the other. But like others have said Sinfield should have played against Huddersfield when he had Sezer there.
"Gary, we don't have any half backs for next season, and I don't think young Sinfield is ready yet" "Right, I'll get the cheque book out and go and buy a full back"
Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13617 Location: West Yorkshire
Simmo71 wrote:"Gary, we don't have any half backs for next season, and I don't think young Sinfield is ready yet" "Right, I'll get the cheque book out and go and buy a full back"
Erm, we needed some pace and a fullback as well, didn’t realise we were only allowed to sign one player.
christopher wrote:Erm, we needed some pace and a fullback as well, didn’t realise we were only allowed to sign one player.
Yep, we needed a fullback with exactly the skill set Miller appears to pocess. Now we need two half backs and a prop. Anything else would be very welcome if it can be delivered within the constraints of the cap.
General rule is the more disruption in the spine the less likely of a positive outcome. Be very hard to pinch a victory tomorrow and the loser is only really then looking to 2024.
Two of KR, Salford and Wire only need to win two out of their last four games to leave us needing to win all four of ours. I'd say the season was done a while ago.
Just on Sinfield, Smith has made clear he doesn't like picking very young players, and some of the signings for this season were to add squad depth with players that were a bit older. I think its time to give Jack a go, but I respect Smith for wanting to protect teenagers.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum