Frosties. wrote:Hopefully we can continue our winning ways at this game, a long way to go but we looked sharp in the second half v Wakefield. Fully expect Handley to be OK.

Myler; Fusitua Newman MacDonald Handley; Austin Sezer; Holroyd O’Connor Tetevano; Bentley Martin; Smith.

Johnson Lisone Sangare Gannon/McDonnell/Walters/Donaldson

Olpherts

Castleford copped a few injuries tonight with Sutcliffe going off with HIA and Westerman getting an injury which should mean they miss the game.

Leeds_Luke wrote:There are some big upsets in the Cas camp at the minute. Personnel are leaving like rats on a sinking ship.

I'm not sure how I'm taking tonights Leeds game. I'll review the footage and first, but I wasn't overly impressed. We failed to look dangerous in the first half, Wakey got plenty of opportunity to put points past us, but also failed to finish.

We only appeared to take control on the second half after Wakey seccumbed to fatigue.

Maybe I missed a few things whilst trying to keep my eyeballs from freezing though.

Shabino wrote:Nilling any SL team is massive.‘defence on song which is pleasing. Fatigue comes from pressure.

Leeds_Luke wrote:Whilst I would normally agree, we are talking about a team with the worse attack in the league by a long shot and one who haven't found the tryline for three weeks now. And they looked more dangerous than us for a long period of the game. If that was any other team we would have gone into half time a couple of scores down and nothing to show for it.

Admittedly, we defended the line well. We held up players a couple of times and prevented what should have been a couple of tries without losing composure.

We did look weak in attack though. Up until Trinity fell apart and we started to put some good plays together. I know it was far from ideal conditions to play flowing rugby, and the players were suffering from the sub-zero temperature. And that goes for both teams.

I just can't help feeling somewhat uninspired by the Leeds performance. I know we would have likely lost the game to any team that actually knows how to score.

The performance did remind me a little of the circa 2011 (?) team how for most of the season would look terrible for the first half, but then pull a win out of the bag with a flurry of scores in the last 20 purely on fitness. Maybe it just looked similar under the circumstances with Trinity, but I hope we are returning to be the fittest team in the League again.

ArthurClues wrote: Think the game plan revolves around moving the ball wider and earlier than the most teams and although mistakes are inevitably made it does tire the opposing middles.

Leeds_Luke wrote:Whilst I would normally agree, we are talking about a team with the worse attack in the league by a long shot and one who haven't found the tryline for three weeks now. And they looked more dangerous than us for a long period of the game. If that was any other team we would have gone into half time a couple of scores down and nothing to show for it.

Admittedly, we defended the line well. We held up players a couple of times and prevented what should have been a couple of tries without losing composure.

We did look weak in attack though. Up until Trinity fell apart and we started to put some good plays together. I know it was far from ideal conditions to play flowing rugby, and the players were suffering from the sub-zero temperature. And that goes for both teams.

I just can't help feeling somewhat uninspired by the Leeds performance. I know we would have likely lost the game to any team that actually knows how to score.

The performance did remind me a little of the circa 2011 (?) team how for most of the season would look terrible for the first half, but then pull a win out of the bag with a flurry of scores in the last 20 purely on fitness. Maybe it just looked similar under the circumstances with Trinity, but I hope we are returning to be the fittest team in the League again.