http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 221484.stm If you read the above, you'll see that Tickle & Tansey are both able to count the Carnegie 9s as one of the games for which they've been banned.
It may be "legal" but hardly a punishment.
Does that mean that really both deserved a one match ban?
Mind you still not on a par with the RU "Bloodgate" scandal.
All that surprises me about that is that people seem surprised tha Richards is portrayed as domineering & a bully.
They clearly didn't watch him play.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 221484.stm If you read the above, you'll see that Tickle & Tansey are both able to count the Carnegie 9s as one of the games for which they've been banned.
It may be "legal" but hardly a punishment.
Does that mean that really both deserved a one match ban?
Mind you still not on a par with the RU "Bloodgate" scandal.
All that surprises me about that is that people seem surprised tha Richards is portrayed as domineering & a bully.
They clearly didn't watch him play.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
