WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

GREG EASTWOOD
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=396269
Page 1 of 7

Author:  N3ERNIE [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:22 am ]
Post subject:  GREG EASTWOOD

LOOKS LIKE HE FANCIES THE WARRIORS ?

Author:  fanstanningley [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: GREG EASTWOOD

N3ERNIE wrote:LOOKS LIKE HE FANCIES THE WARRIORS ?
Makes sense they have just released Luaki to Hull.

Author:  Gotcha [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: GREG EASTWOOD

N3ERNIE wrote:LOOKS LIKE HE FANCIES THE WARRIORS ?


At least reword that to talk sense.

The Warriors fancy HIM, as a replacement for Luaki. There is no reference or quote to Eastwood himself.

Author:  Shiny-Rhino [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: GREG EASTWOOD

N3ERNIE wrote:LOOKS LIKE HE FANCIES THE WARRIORS ?



LINK.?

Author:  flipper [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: GREG EASTWOOD

Shiny-Rhino wrote:LINK.?


Link
Shiny-Rhino wrote:LINK.?


Link

Author:  N3ERNIE [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

its leaguehq.com quote Should Eastwood, who left the Broncos at the end of last season after signing with Leeds, fail in his second attempt after the rejection of an application for an ancestry visa - reportedly due to a string of speeding offences - the Warriors have expressed an interest in him returning to his birthplace of Auckland.

Eastwood has also indicated he would be keen to play for the Warriors, who already had some room to move under the salary cap after the tragic disappearance of Sonny Fai, who is presumed drowned.

Author:  Leeds_Rhydon [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

I for one would have preferred Eastwood's money to go towards keeping Scruton. To be without both would be an uncharacteristic blunder from Hetherington in my opinion.

Author:  rhinoms [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

Leeds_Rhydon wrote:I for one would have preferred Eastwood's money to go towards keeping Scruton. To be without both would be an uncharacteristic blunder from Hetherington in my opinion.

That was never an issue we still had money spare after the confirmed signing of eastwood and if scruton had stayed.
GH wouldn't break the wage structure for scruton and good on him for it.
As for being without both that remains to be seen and don't dismiss the idea that GH has a plan B. :wink:

Author:  Rogues Gallery [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

Leeds_Rhydon wrote:I for one would have preferred Eastwood's money to go towards keeping Scruton. To be without both would be an uncharacteristic blunder from Hetherington in my opinion.


The extra money will pay for Boderus medication.

Do you think he'll rival Paul Sculthorpe for time on the operating table?

Author:  Tony Soprano [ Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Rogues Gallery wrote:The extra money will pay for Boderus medication.


Is that in Turkey?

Page 1 of 7 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/