Clearwing wrote:Mine too, unless I hear a convincing counter argument.
Have you had one yet?
G1 wrote:Wigan Pie man's inference is clear for all to read in his post. Appalling really.
Yes, it is. On both counts. If he would just accept that he's made a mistake he would at least get some respect. However, by trying to argue he hasn't said it when the evidence is there for all to see he leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.
G1 wrote:I will leave the subject there as I don't want to comment further on last Sunday's incidents out of respect. I certainly wouldn't use them to score points on an Internet forum, unlike some.
Me too. Unfortunately we've been drawn into it by someone showing a total lack of respect then turning it round onto someone who has posted an unrelated innocuous thread. What people dont realise is I'm far more intelligent than them and always one step ahead. I wont be bullied by people and Barry has tripped himslef up here.
G1 wrote:But what has been said is clear and for all to see and make their own judgment upon.
I dont like to get drawn into these kind of arguments but I agree with you. IMO Wigan Pie Man has bloodied his nose here big time. I've seen people trip up but this guy has tripped up and fallen straight into the steps, nose first. He didnt realise that someone may have kept what he posted and thought he'd got away with it and was free to have a go at others (despite what they posted having nothing to do with what he was getting at)
G1 wrote:Appalling really.
Yes.
wigan pie man wrote:not in this case im not, and i was careful not to post any conclusions to this case until after the investigation.
Yeah. Course you were.
wigan pie man wrote:nail on head.....probably, allegedly. Folk just dont build up overnight without additional "substances/nutrients"
Allegedly doesnt exonerate you. You responded to a quote about the last 6-8 months at Wakefield and training substances being used by saying nail on head. The tragic incident on Sunday is part of the last 6-8 months. Dont try to wriggle out of what you said.
wigan pie man wrote:i touched on steroid abuse in general
no you didnt. You were specific.
wigan pie man wrote:i will stick my neck out and say that i believe this lads death was a tragic accident. (dont reply to that please as a mark of respect for the family and the forum)
That's one hell of a backtrack but i'm afraid it's too late. We know what you meant.
I feel for you, I really do.
If this is the best you can come up with after the diatribe you've been shown to have posted then it's no wonder i've got you on the canvas with very little effort.
FWIW, no I havent, I sit at home of a night backing up my screen dump database.
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:And away we go again with personal insults over a computer from someone who rants and raves over it when it happens about a Leeds player
Am I though?
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:and then starts threads about cowardice
You do realise the cowardice threads are a mickey take dont you? You did know that didnt you?
You mean you didnt?
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:from his computer in 'tough as old boots Leeds' !
It beggars belief that you are still going on about that incredibly poor trolling effort. Even I said to myself, "No one is gonna go for that
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:The epitomy of hypocrisy.
You finally got it. Well done.
wigan pie man wrote:you know mate.....that avatar suits you.....i think your trying too hard to be as obnoxious as him.
You dont know who it is do you?
You think you do but you dont.
Who is it?
wigan pie man wrote:you act like him,.
Who is it? how does he act?
wigan pie man wrote:bully the posters , then hide behind your mates posts.
Does the person in my avatar do that? Be careful.
wigan pie man wrote:are you like that in life?
Like what?
wigan pie man wrote:i bet you hit innocent people then run off
No. I dont cast aspersions either.
wigan pie man wrote:try being nice
Like casting aspersions baout the death of one of the players you mean?
Is that nice?
Is nameing the JJB what you did nice?
Is using the events of the weekend as a vehicle to have a go at someone nice?
wigan pie man wrote:politeness costs nowt
Where have I beeen impolite?
I've simply defended myslef. Problem is you expected me to just accept your diatribe but you picked the wrong one to try it on with.
Longun wrote:Very much so. Please don't lock it yet...I think Mr Monkey is just getting started, and the fish are hungry
What I dont like Chris is people taking liberties. wigan pie man has taken a liberty by having a go at me for starting this thread when a young lad lost his life on Sunday despite that having no relevance to this thread at all. The thing is, he is the bad guy here. He has a go at me knowing full well he'd directed accusations at the Wakefield club in an erlier post. What he didnt reckon on was that someone had saved his post and it would come back and bite him on the backside. He thought he'd got away with it. He hadn't.
As for the fish being hungry, Stirlingshire Saint bites without me even trying and even when I tell him to stop biting he still does.
