I am a fanatical Rhino , but there is no way foul play preventing a score should not be seen by the video ref . It has to be a penalty try. That incident changes the whole game - you cannot save a certin try with foul play without a try being awarded - there is no defence - end of. The standard of refereeing and video ref is woeful , whilst the product on the field is excellent .
Shabino wrote:No wasn’t deliberate, but there’s no way he stops him like that in conventional ways. Too strong. Was a big moment too coz if Hudds score there and they are possibly too far ahead….. Was a game incident, but I’d be ok with a 1 match ban. We can cover Myler for the Hull game….
You see stuff like this and worse in the Nrl and it doesn't even get a mention no way is it a ban 10mins was harsh.
Joined: Nov 19 2002 Posts: 13622 Location: West Yorkshire
Boots wrote:I am a fanatical Rhino , but there is no way foul play preventing a score should not be seen by the video ref . It has to be a penalty try. That incident changes the whole game - you cannot save a certin try with foul play without a try being awarded - there is no defence - end of. The standard of refereeing and video ref is woeful , whilst the product on the field is excellent .
It might not have been viewed as a certain try as there were other leeds players in the vicinity,
Boots wrote:I am a fanatical Rhino , but there is no way foul play preventing a score should not be seen by the video ref . It has to be a penalty try. That incident changes the whole game - you cannot save a certin try with foul play without a try being awarded - there is no defence - end of. The standard of refereeing and video ref is woeful , whilst the product on the field is excellent .
Penalty trys seem to be the new thing but this wasn't one of them.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
