G1 wrote: It would have been very easy for ermentrude, or any other fan, to justify their comments about Bailey rather than cry about what I posted but none did. Why do you think that is?
It still is, this is an open forum, anyone can express their opinion as long as they can justify it when challenged...
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
Joined: Jul 22 2008 Posts: 16170 Location: Somewhere other than here
McLaren_Field wrote:He has not been charged with, nor has he pleaded guilty to "pushing another man".
Maybe you should go back and read the press again...
He was charged with and pled guilty to 'common assault' (a Section 39 offence I believe). Common assault is a broad offence. If I touched you and you did not want me to touch you, you could have me charged with common assault. Pryce's version was a push.
I've read what it says in the press closely, thanks. I also know about the charge of common assault. I'm training to be a teacher; we have to be wary of such things.
SaintsFan wrote:He was charged with and pled guilty to 'common assault' (a Section 39 offence I believe). Common assault is a broad offence. If I touched you and you did not want me to touch you, you could have me charged with common assault. Pryce's version was a push.
Psst the press report also says the magistrates refused to accept this version...
SaintsFan wrote:He was charged with and pled guilty to 'common assault' (a Section 39 offence I believe). Common assault is a broad offence. If I touched you and you did not want me to touch you, you could have me charged with common assault. Pryce's version was a push.
I've read what it says in the press closely, thanks. I also know about the charge of common assault. I'm training to be a teacher; we have to be wary of such things.
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
Joined: Mar 03 2002 Posts: 9424 Location: Bringing out the devil in you!
SaintsFan wrote: I've read what it says in the press closely, thanks. I also know about the charge of common assault. I'm training to be a teacher; we have to be wary of such things.
Thats why we're champions, thats why we're champions!!!!! Back to back to back!!!!
Rhinos - each and every one of you are a legend in your own right..........get in!!!!!!!
Joined: Jul 22 2008 Posts: 16170 Location: Somewhere other than here
DoubleAone wrote:Psst the press report also says the magistrates refused to accept this version...
Bollox. Here's the relevant section of the report (from the print version of League Express dated 30 March 2009:
Quote:When neither Ms Reardon nor Mr O'Brien answered the door, Reardon sent a text message to O'Brien claiming their son was in hospital. He then shoulder-barged the door, to gain entry. Rearden grabbed his ex-wife's arm "momentarily", causing three bruises. Pryce then pushed O'Brien, who had a rounders bat for protection, causing him to fall backwards and hit his head and neck on a pedal bin. In mitigation for Pryce, Nigel said neither defendant intended to use violence that night and claimed that his client was there as a "peacemaker". District Judge Nick Watson said, 'Mr Pryce, far from being a peacemaker, did nothing to stop it. It is clear the couple were terrified. It is hardly surprising to me that Mr O'Brien felt he had to arm himself with a bat in the circumstances. You need to understand that a prison sentence is what I have in mind at the moment for this offence.' Another charge of using violence to gain entry against Pryce and Reardon was dropped after the prosecution offered no evidence. Sentencing ... [etc, etc]"
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
