Joined: Aug 02 2002 Posts: 7300 Location: Wakefield but near to Leeds!
Zig wrote:Wire have spent no more than most of the other teams unless you are suggesting they are breaching the salary cap.
They wouldn`t be the first. They`ve been buying top players for years and still haven`t won a GF. Like I said anything out of the top 2 and it should be classed as a failure. Back on Leeds and Hardaker. My understanding from one of Zaks mates was that he would have stayed had we offered him 2 years but we only offered him 1 initially. Leigh came knocking and offered him far more than us and understandably he took it. Our best player by plenty last year.
Joined: Aug 02 2002 Posts: 7300 Location: Wakefield but near to Leeds!
Once were Loiners wrote:Myler is absolutely key to our attack though, partly because our halfbacks aren't the best but in the core skills of fullbacks he's lacking a few. Maybe Hooley can develop into a real alternative.
Mate from what I`ve seen of Hooley and for that matter Macdonald they ain`t going to help our defence much.
No idea although from the little I've seen Hooley looks weak on the line. MacDonald probably cruised in most games last year as Leigh won at a canter. We can only hope...
Joined: Dec 19 2004 Posts: 24451 Location: in bed between halle berry and jennifer aniston
smith has a reputation for 'thinking outside the box'. Well playing four wingers across the backline, and the best two out of position, was shambolic. the signings have been strange, and most of us questioned signing Robert's and oliphants whilst ditching hardaker. as for wire and the salary cap perhaps if some of their yorkshire based ex players didn't come into work telling everyone about their extra payments and bmws arriving at their houses unannounced maybe there wouldn't be these rumours, which have been around for years. not that it's done them much good....
That was a tough watch wasn't it. However poor we were I think Warrington have to take a lot of credit. The speed and intensity they came out of the blocks with they didn't give us a chance to play and by the time we adapted the game was gone. A couple of bits of bad luck thrown in for good measure. The two teams looked absolutely miles apart in terms of sharpness though didn't they? Our preseason schedule certainly doesn't seem to have delivered us in prime condition for round 1. We never seem to start strong through do we and I trust Smith to get us in shape but we don't help ourselves turning up so far off. Myler had a stinker didn't he. Just a really bad day at the office for him. I was really disappointed in Sezer though - didn't seem to want to get involved and left Austin trying to overcompensate and he suffered a bit as a result. Thought Cam went well when he came on as did Sangare. Our preseason approach made it pretty much impossible to get a true gauge on where we are. I guess now we know. Plenty for them to do this week.
Awful performance and hugely disappointing. There's a long way to go this year and I expect us to improve on that. I also expect a typical Powell season for Wire with some lovely rugby being played but fall short again. But that's for them to worry about.
Thought Lisone looked good in his last stint amd Sangare added some bite with his runs. Holroyd struggled with the physicality but given his lack of playing over the last 12 months, it's understandable. I really struggle to see what Tetevano brings to the team. Doesn't make big metres and doesn't dominate in defence. I'd have Smith starting all day long. We seemed to have more going on in attack when he was getting his hands on the ball.
Wire had the game won before half time, and thankfully there aren't many teams with packs like that.
On to next week. But not really time to start panicking or thinking this game is a prelude to the season. Surely as Leeds fans we know its not how you start
Joined: Feb 26 2002 Posts: 9576 Location: anywhere, literally...
fanstanningley wrote:I think the Olpherts deal was all ready done before hardhaker negotiations had even started.
Me too, it was done months before it was announced and as a result there was very little money left for Zak. When I say we chose Olpherts over Hardaker, I mean we chose to spend the money on him first.
It's not how much talent you've got, it's what you do with it that counts.
Joined: Dec 29 2005 Posts: 2246 Location: with the barefoot girls
I would start O'Connor and Smith next week. Use Leeming off the bench and bring in Walters for Tetevano. I appreciate that it's the 1st game and we know better than most how things can change over the course of the season , but that was a terrible start. A real lack of intensity and effort on occasions last night. Sangare looked a handful and should help Oledzki get us on the front foot when he returns. The starting props were 2nd best last night, but given that neither played much at that level last season, it may take time. The halfbacks may have been behind a beaten pack and received little good ball, but they were poor, especially Sezer. Olpherts carried the ball well and took his chance with an excellent finish. If we get everyone fit I can see him keeping his place in the side, although that would mean either him or Handley moving to the right wing.
Woody: Can I pour you a draft, Mr. Peterson?
Norm: A little early, isn't it Woody?
Woody: For a beer?
Norm: No, for stupid questions.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum