Joined: Dec 29 2005 Posts: 2244 Location: with the barefoot girls
STEVENM1000 wrote:Firstly would Arthur want to come over just for a few months as a stand in and probably would feel insulted by that. If Rowley was contracted in advance for next season and Arthur was successful we potentially end up in a worse position if Rowley fails.
I was thinking if that was something that suited Arthur as much as Leeds, in that he was free for another NRL job next season. It maybe that he wants the job full-time in which case he would then be offered a fulltime contract.
Woody: Can I pour you a draft, Mr. Peterson?
Norm: A little early, isn't it Woody?
Woody: For a beer?
Norm: No, for stupid questions.
Seth wrote:Danny Buderus says in the talk to the players (where jjb speaks for 6 minutes and Buderus speaks for 2) 'the games always been won on the advantage line', that's all that needs saying on the failings of smith philosophies
Yep absolutely spot on. It was a great talk by both men. He’d probably make a good coach Bedsy. Some player he was
ArthurClues wrote:Paul Rowley proving his value again today. Salford beat Saints on a fairly regular basis.
Yep. He would be my choice. Trouble with coaches from Australia, is they tend to only stop a couple of seasons, as they either get an offer in the NRL or the wives get homesick. We need stability for more than a couple of seasons.
Bit of a strange one this! Does Rowley stay where he is and carry on with the Salford project and be seen as the next big thing. Or does he jump ship and move to us with totally different pressures loose a few this year and we’ll all blame the squad Smith assembled. But a poor off season and a poor start and everyone will be calling for his replacement.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
