What's funny????
The current debate is about centre's is it not??? and or back-rowers!!!
There is depth within the squad at the moment to cover centre and backrow from within our acadamy whereas if kylie left it would leave us light in the front row.

He's looked ok to me when i've seen him play pre-season and what i've seen in the acadamy wether he's ready to step up yet i don't know!!

King Monkey wrote: http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/r ... 5074003.jp The authors name at the top of that article says it all for me.....

King Monkey wrote: http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/r ... 5074003.jp The authors name at the top of that article says it all for me.....

Not for me it aint.

I would not want to lose a gifted british player who can cover various positions, whilst paying for overseas players. I thought that was the argument of some.

Equally, I would also not want to lose Kylie.

Ta luv.

"When players come out of contract, they are free to do what they want." - Gary Hetherington

Read between those lines (or words on a line.)

Hang on who said anything about signing overseas players to replace smith????
I don't want to lose either player but the squad would be in need of a replacement to be signed if kylie leaves.
Whereas imo IF smith goes we have webb,Bjb and broughton who can cover his loss aswell as versatility within the squad to absorb that loss.
I also think wires have been crossed here disa re-signing a new centre now debate.

I actually think he makes a good serious point or have i been reeled in???

For the first time since the speculation began, I'm now of the opinion that Lee Smith is actually leaving for Wasps. He will take some replacing, but we will do it.

If Leuluai does leave for that great pension fund over the hill, will we be tempted to take Scruton back if the Bulls are doing nothing? I bet he'd come back for Kylie's salary.