Disco wrote:Injuries permitting, we should rest nobody.
Aye - momentum, consistency, continuity and all that.
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Who would you rest for keighley https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=402433 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | franchisecas [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Who would you rest for keighley |
I would rest the 2 main Props in sarge and Feather. If Boyle is fit i would give him a runout. Also anyone else who is not 100% should be rested. This would be a good game to give widders a full run out and not just 10-15 mins from the bench and give James Ford a go on the wing. |
|
| Author: | tb [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
TM says we'll be fielding the "strongest fit team" Make of that what you will. |
|
| Author: | pyeman [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Who would you rest for keighley |
franchisecas wrote:I would rest the 2 main Props in sarge and Feather. If Boyle is fit i would give him a runout.
Also anyone else who is not 100% should be rested. This would be a good game to give widders a full run out and not just 10-15 mins from the bench and give James Ford a go on the wing. Rest sarge, feather, shifty, shenny, evans and jones. Give arundel, gledhill, boyle, davies, ford, thompson and wainwright (if fit) a run out. I would also try owen at fb, to build up his confidence there. |
|
| Author: | StuMain [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Who would you rest for keighley |
pyeman wrote:I would also try owen at fb, to build up his confidence there.
As far as possible I'd leave positions unchanged. Players need to use this game to continue gelling in the positions Terry wants them playing regularly. While acknowledging tb's point, I suspect we'll not see Shenton, Sherwin, Sargent, Ferres or Westerman. |
|
| Author: | Gronk! [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd line up with: 1. McGoldrick 2. Owen 3. Ford 4. Arundal 5. Thompson 6. Faumuina 7. Chase 8. Massey 9. Netherton 10. Huby 11. Harris 12. Widders 13. Westerman 14. Sargent 15. Hudson 16. Gledhill 17. Boyle Shenton and Sherwin would be unnecessary risks against Keighley. Ferres is injured, Jones deserves a rest, as does Evans. |
|
| Author: | Disco [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Injuries permitting, we should rest nobody. |
|
| Author: | Bonzo [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Disco wrote:Injuries permitting, we should rest nobody.
Aye - momentum, consistency, continuity and all that.
|
|
| Author: | Dead Man Walking [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Disco wrote:Injuries permitting, we should rest nobody.
I agree with you. |
|
| Author: | WHELDON-ROAD-END [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I would give Jones and Evans the weekend off again to get fully fit, flu is a bugger to over come. Also id probably give Sherwin and Sarge/Feather 1 or ther other a weekend off. That said putting in Arundel, Massey, Boyle (who played well for 21's saturday) and Ford, who could do with a run out. |
|
| Author: | Rave-on [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Gaslight wrote:I'd line up with:
1. McGoldrick 2. Owen 3. Ford 4. Arundal 5. Thompson 6. Faumuina 7. Chase 8. Massey 9. Netherton 10. Huby 11. Harris 12. Widders 13. Westerman 14. Sargent 15. Hudson 16. Gledhill 17. Boyle Shenton and Sherwin would be unnecessary risks against Keighley. Ferres is injured, Jones deserves a rest, as does Evans. I would agree with this team line-up. I do also think we should keep the momentum going and keep gelling the players but its an pointless risking injury, when we can beat keighley with most of reserves |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|