I've just been looking at the shaymen.net forum and noticed a thread entitled Shay and Hoddie.... It is referring to a working party of six, mostly Town fans as far as i can see, who have been in talks regarding the running of The Shay and have been having discussions since July. It's the first i've heard of this, i wonder if anyone on here has any knowledge of it?

First i'd heard too when the Courier broke the news this morning.All Town fans,who've certainly been keeping their powder dry.

Good Afternoon,

As some of you may now be aware from the statement released on the Courier website, (and attached below) a working group got together in July to start to look at how the long term future of the Shay Stadium could be safeguarded both as a sporting venue and a community asset. I was very pleased to have been invited onto the working group and a lot of work has gone into getting to where we are now.

Discussions have taken place with the Council, Football and Rugby clubs and initial reactions on the whole have been favourable.

We are still very much at the early stages and whilst it is of course up to yourself if you believe this is the best way forward, we hope as many fans as possible of both the football and rugby clubs feel that they can support this proposal which would add significant weight to progressing with the parties involved.

There will of course be many questions. I believe the Courier will be inviting readers to put forward any questions they may have. I am also happy to collate any questions you may have to forward to the working group for a response.

Regards,

Simon

Just got this email from Simon Denton-Treasurer of Halifax Town supporters club.

So is this just a revamp of the old Shay Stadium Trust or whatever is was called in the past - seems to involve some of the same people. How did that work and end up? I suspect its an opposition to an alternative consortium rumoured to be interested. We might also need to accept that if you want investment, you can't accept that businesses or individuals will keep doing so with no possible return for themselves, but at the same time enabling revenue streams for both clubs - if they want to be on board (even if that is % of income form other events/activities).

Hoddie can't even run his own forum impartially , anyway I will be emailing the Council the transcripts from his forum, expose his real feelings on the rugby club , squatters out and all that .

Listenup94 wrote:Hoddie can't even run his own forum impartially , anyway I will be emailing the Council the transcripts from his forum, expose his real feelings on the rugby club , squatters out and all that . Just to clarify as this Post has been copied and pasted on to the shaymen forum and unsurprisingly mocked , what hoddie doesn't realise is as a moderater of the forum that he will be held accountable for not just what he posts but what he allows to be posted especially when someone according to his consortiums proposals as the best interests of both clubs at heart which is quite clearly a lie https://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/topic/31 ... ent-816096

Listenup94 wrote:Hoddie can't even run his own forum impartially , anyway I will be emailing the Council the transcripts from his forum, expose his real feelings on the rugby club , squatters out and all that . Just to clarify as this Post has been copied and pasted on to the shaymen forum and unsurprisingly mocked , what hoddie doesn't realise is as a moderater of the forum that he will be held accountable for not just what he posts but what he allows to be posted especially when someone according to his consortiums proposals as the best interests of both clubs at heart which is quite clearly a lie https://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/topic/31 ... ent-816096

Listenup94 wrote:Just to clarify as this Post has been copied and pasted on to the shaymen forum and unsurprisingly mocked , what hoddie doesn't realise is as a moderater of the forum that he will be held accountable for not just what he posts but what he allows to be posted especially when someone according to his consortiums proposals as the best interests of both clubs at heart which is quite clearly a lie https://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/topic/31 ... ent-816096 Hoddie (aka Clive Anderson) is a little div.

Listenup94 wrote:Just to clarify as this Post has been copied and pasted on to the shaymen forum and unsurprisingly mocked , what hoddie doesn't realise is as a moderater of the forum that he will be held accountable for not just what he posts but what he allows to be posted especially when someone according to his consortiums proposals as the best interests of both clubs at heart which is quite clearly a lie https://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/topic/31 ... ent-816096 Hoddie (aka Clive Anderson) is a little div.

See the footy's been called off for a waterlogged pitch and rearranged for Saturday the 4th , hope them twiglet footy lads don't churn up the pitch for saltys testimonial. Hopefully the heirs to the throne hoddie and bubba are doing everything they can to make sure this doesn't happen

If you are a regular visitor to theshaymen.net forum, you will know that over the years I have stuck up for Fax in relation to the pitch use. It is fair to say the pitch isnt fit for use, but thats not the fault of Fax or FCHT. Its the nature of dual use and a lack of investment in the pitch over many years.

I never go on there and never will but by your own admission it just goes to show over the years regarding the pitch how much abuse and unfair blame Fax and their supporters have had to put up with past, present and no doubt future from those on the shaymen.net forum and what sort of people they really are and when someone puts a game or a piece of grass before people where the biggest problem is.