WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=645094 |
Page 1 of 14 |
Author: | Listenup94 [ Tue Aug 29, 2023 4:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
The end of the season is nigh and despite the recent results we are still in with a minor shout for the playoffs , here are the remaining fixtures for the positions from 3 to 9 , how do we see it panning out ? Bradford vs featherstone Bradford vs York London vs Bradford Sheffield vs Bradford Sheffield vs London Sheffield vs Keighley Widnes vs Sheffield Sheffield vs Bradford Sheffield vs London London vs Widnes London vs Bradford London vs Keighley Widnes vs Batley Batley vs Whitehaven York vs Batley Batley vs Newcastle Widnes vs Batley London vs Widnes Widnes vs Sheffield Featherstone vs Widnes Whitehaven vs Halifax Halifax vs Toulouse Keighley vs Halifax Halifax vs Swinton York vs Swinton Bradford vs York York vs Batley Barrow vs York |
Author: | Tony Fax [ Wed Aug 30, 2023 7:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
I predict they'll finish thus: 3rd - Sheffield - 34 points 4th - London - 32 5th - Super Fax - 31 6th - Bullies - 31 7th - Batley - 30 8th - Widnes - 28 9th - York - 28 |
Author: | gizempo [ Wed Aug 30, 2023 7:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
That means winning all our last 4, we've only done 4 on the trot once all season (which included the Bulls cup game). We do have the easiest run in, assuming TLoos put their cue back in the rack - if they win away to Newcastle and Bulls lose at home to Fev this week, they will be guaranteed 2nd. To be honest, I don't have much confidence in us getting a win at Haven. |
Author: | terry silver [ Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
I think that it will come down to us and Batley for the final spot. And we will need to win all our remaining games to sneak in. |
Author: | faxcar [ Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
Still not an impossibility but on form a distinct improbability. Going up to Keswick for a week and will take in the Haven game where anything could happen. |
Author: | terry silver [ Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
What would be everyone's team for sunday, we should be close to full strength mine would be. Woody Salty Crooks Maizen Walmsley Louis Keyes Fleming O Brian Calcott Kav Gee Fairbank Tangata Lannon Ben foster Ingham I am not putting all the blame on Sutcliffe for the 3 tries we conceded down our left side, he just didn't seem to carry the ball with much purpose and missed some what i would call soft tackles. And i would like to see if Foster could bring some energy and intent to our pack. Also Tom ingham should be brought in for Moore this would give us some energy and more threat out of acting half. |
Author: | Miserybusiness [ Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
In the main would agree.Know nothing about Forster so would try Sutcliffe in forwards as he was apparently great there in France.Need to know now what he brings and whether theres anything more to come from fleming.Pretty tough on Pickers to get castigated for a very difficult dead ball call but id agree with JWH.Maybe try hammering the ball towards the touchline would be a better dropout option that dollying it in the air as with 80% of our general kicking game.We tried one thing different last week and it came off.. |
Author: | Listenup94 [ Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
Not sure if maizen is fit has he was walking around with a boot on , on Sunday but certainly think he’s walmsley best centre partner . I understand why sutcliffe was played at centre but it didn’t work so would put him on the bench . I actually think maizen is a winger and would switch salty to centre and play maizen on the wing . |
Author: | Hudd-Shay [ Thu Aug 31, 2023 6:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
Miserybusiness wrote:In the main would agree.Know nothing about Forster so would try Sutcliffe in forwards as he was apparently great there in France.Need to know now what he brings and whether theres anything more to come from fleming.Pretty tough on Pickers to get castigated for a very difficult dead ball call but id agree with JWH.Maybe try hammering the ball towards the touchline would be a better dropout option that dollying it in the air as with 80% of our general kicking game.We tried one thing different last week and it came off.. Spot on! |
Author: | Greg Florimos Boots [ Fri Sep 01, 2023 8:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: BATTLE FOR THE PLAYOFFS |
Miserybusiness wrote:Maybe try hammering the ball towards the touchline would be a better dropout option that dollying it in the air as with 80% of our general kicking game.We tried one thing different last week and it came off.. NFL style analytics are coming more and more in to our game and we will see a lot more of it at our level over the next couple of years and this is one area where it will stand out. Teams are willing to give up field position from a drop out to try and have a contested restart and knowing that even if they don't get the ball back your goal line is the easiest place to defend on the pitch other than inside the opponents 10m. The question at our level is if there are the skill levels to support it. Back on topic I reckon a loss to Haven, a win against Toulouse followed by a loss to Keighley. Its now very much win all 4 and we will make the playoffs, win 3 and its very unlikely and then any less and its the worst finish since Marshall left and the 2nd worst finish since after maybe the 2004 season. |
Page 1 of 14 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |