WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

MOM v Gateshead
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=407422
Page 1 of 4

Author:  pinballwizzard [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:08 pm ]
Post subject:  MOM v Gateshead

1 Shadrack
2 James
3 Miles

Author:  FFA [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

3pts- Shad
2pts- Penky
1pt- James

Author:  faxtastic [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

3 points: shad
2 points: penky
1 point: wrenchy

Author:  griffax [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

3pts Shadrach
2pts Matt James
1pt Miles (just gets better & better)

Author:  The Scratchin shed ghost [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

3) Shad

2) James

1) Wrenchy

Scored 72 today and for large parts I thought we were awful. Completion rate in the forties, six tries conceded. We will need to be much much better to beat Fev

Author:  harry1 [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

3 shad
2 wrench
1 james

i was underwhelmed with the defence today

Author:  faxtastic [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

The Scratchin shed ghost wrote:3) Shad

2) James

1) Wrenchy

Scored 72 today and for large parts I thought we were awful. Completion rate in the forties, six tries conceded. We will need to be much much better to beat Fev


yes we did concede 6 tries but i think the way we play we are always going to concede points. we are better in defence this year than we were last year. i dont know about you i would not want us to change the way we play.

Author:  Zaphod_B [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

3 - Royston
2 - Paterson
1 - James

Author:  The Scratchin shed ghost [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

The Scratchin shed ghost wrote:

3) Shad

2) James

1) Wrenchy

Scored 72 today and for large parts I thought we were awful. Completion rate in the forties, six tries conceded. We will need to be much much better to beat Fev

faxtastic wrote:yes we did concede 6 tries but i think the way we play we are always going to concede points. we are better in defence this year than we were last year. i dont know about you i would not want us to change the way we play.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Think it depends who we are playing to be honest. I suppose if everything we did came off we'd be top of Super League.

I do like our game but we don't have to go all Harlem Globetrotters on every play. If we did the basics better today we would have scored a whole lot more. Against Fev we will need to build the pressure and we won't achieve that by not completing our sets. Also their tries came from our crap defending which has got nothing to do with our attack. I accept that there was no need to throw bodies on the line today but good habits breed good habits

Not complaining really - just didn't come away today as enthused as normal

Author:  urbancarrot [ Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

shad
black
james


Defence was pantz

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/