WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
Team for Haven https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=404165 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | FFA [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Team for Haven |
1. Miles 2. Pats 3. Haley 4. Shad 5. Worrincy 6. Govin 7. Black 8. James 9. Gleeson 10. Larder/Barker 11. Roberts 12. Smith 13. Beswick Subs: 14. Penky 15. Andy Bowman 16. Tamghart 17. Frank Really tough, cant completely drop bowman and barker has been great past few games but difficult to find a place for him. Don't know what Calland will do |
Author: | billyfax [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
1. Miles Greenwood 2. Lee Paterson, 3. James Haley 4. Shad Royston 5. Rob Worrincy 6. Bob Beswick 7. Ben Black 8. Matt James 9. Mark Gleeson 10. Dana Wilson 11. Dave Larder 12. Mark Roberts 13. Paul Smith Subs: 14. Sean Penkywicz 15. Mick Govin 16. Said Tamghart 17. Frank Watene |
Author: | griffax [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Up there we need the strongest team we have, especially in the forwards. Whilst I think Bowman had a great game last night, it's horses for courses & think he wouldnt be as effective up there, so for me,. Larder would be ahead of him. |
Author: | heathen55 [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Team for Haven |
ads7fax wrote:1. Miles
2. Pats 3. Haley 4. Shad 5. Worrincy 6. Govin 7. Black 8. James 9. Gleeson 10. Larder/Barker 11. Roberts 12. Smith 13. Beswick What's Cherryholme done wrong? Subs: 14. Penky 15. Andy Bowman 16. Tamghart 17. Frank Really tough, cant completely drop bowman and barker has been great past few games but difficult to find a place for him. Don't know what Calland will do |
Author: | FFA [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
nothing, just think others would be more effective |
Author: | heathen55 [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
So you'd consider 2 non props (albeit Larder in more than capable) as part of the starting XIII. Has Barker ever played prop?.We need our strongest pack out on Monday and that would have to include James and Cherryholme as starters |
Author: | seanfax [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
interesting to see nobody as picked cherryholme, i dont think people really notice how much work he does, the amount of hit ups and tackles he does goes unoticed, i think there should be a place for him in that team |
Author: | heathen55 [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I think i just agreed with you |
Author: | billyfax [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Indeed Chrryholme has been playing well however i think he's only in if there is an injury doubt on any of the players i listed in my team. With Barker being the injury replacement should penky not be fit. With beswick and roberts both being capable of moving from backs to pack or vice versa, i think cherryholme and barker miss out in the team. However they would be in the 19 man squad. |
Author: | Halifax RLFC 4eva [ Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Team for Haven |
ads7fax wrote:1. Miles
2. Pats 3. Haley 4. Shad 5. Worrincy 6. Govin 7. Black 8. James 9. Gleeson 10. Larder/Barker 11. Roberts 12. Smith 13. Beswick Subs: 14. Penky 15. Andy Bowman 16. Tamghart 17. Frank Really tough, cant completely drop bowman and barker has been great past few games but difficult to find a place for him. Don't know what Calland will do Has Barker every played prop before |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |