WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

M.O.M. v Hunslet (a) 15/02/09
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=394793
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Tortured Soul [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  M.O.M. v Hunslet (a) 15/02/09

Please leave your votes below.

3pts = 1st choice
2pts = 2nd choice
1pt = 3rd choice

Watene
Cherryholme
Haley

Author:  a.n Other [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

3 pts Watene

2 pts Greenwood

1 pt Cherryholme

Author:  heathen55 [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

Tamghart
Watene
Roberts

Author:  pinballwizzard [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

watene
roberts
cherryholme

Author:  dazednconfused [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

3 - Frankie - Looking stronger and making more yards than last season.

2 - Mark Roberts - Good forward aggression and broke through regularly.

1 - Shad - Looks really determined to hold on to the No 1 position despite an equally strong display from Miles when he entered the game.

Author:  seanfax [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

3pts - frank
2pts- shad
1pt - roberts

Author:  urbancarrot [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

frank

shad

roberts..


No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.

Author:  Tortured Soul [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

urbancarrot wrote:No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.


:P

Author:  griffax [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

3pts Frankie

2pts Greenwood

1pt Roberts

Author:  pinballwizzard [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

urbancarrot wrote:frank

shad

roberts..


No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.


his second spell was very effective. surprised he played, but just because he isn't a big name doesn't mean e should be easy to bag. his inclusion in my top three was indicative of how garbage everyone else was.

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/