WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
M.O.M. v Hunslet (a) 15/02/09 https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=394793 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Tortured Soul [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | M.O.M. v Hunslet (a) 15/02/09 |
Please leave your votes below. 3pts = 1st choice 2pts = 2nd choice 1pt = 3rd choice Watene Cherryholme Haley |
Author: | a.n Other [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
3 pts Watene 2 pts Greenwood 1 pt Cherryholme |
Author: | heathen55 [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Tamghart Watene Roberts |
Author: | pinballwizzard [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
watene roberts cherryholme |
Author: | dazednconfused [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
3 - Frankie - Looking stronger and making more yards than last season. 2 - Mark Roberts - Good forward aggression and broke through regularly. 1 - Shad - Looks really determined to hold on to the No 1 position despite an equally strong display from Miles when he entered the game. |
Author: | seanfax [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
3pts - frank 2pts- shad 1pt - roberts |
Author: | urbancarrot [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
frank shad roberts.. No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games. |
Author: | Tortured Soul [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
urbancarrot wrote:No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.
![]() |
Author: | griffax [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
3pts Frankie 2pts Greenwood 1pt Roberts |
Author: | pinballwizzard [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
urbancarrot wrote:frank
shad roberts.. No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games. his second spell was very effective. surprised he played, but just because he isn't a big name doesn't mean e should be easy to bag. his inclusion in my top three was indicative of how garbage everyone else was. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |