WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
Asda price? https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=561662 |
Page 1 of 12 |
Author: | Mintball [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:00 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Asda price? | ||||
|
Author: | bramleyrhino [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:06 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? | ||||
|
Author: | peggy [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:16 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? | ||||
|
Author: | Mintball [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:19 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? | ||||
|
Author: | DaveO [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:25 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? | ||||
|
Author: | Mintball [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? |
DaveO wrote:The comments below that article are even more depressing. How can those college educated "I am all right jack, so you can be to" types not have the brains to understand not everyone is college material and that we all need people to work in service industries such as restaurants and supermarkets? We've had the same on here – people claiming that if others want decent pay, they can simply 'aspire' themselves into better-paid jobs. The same people never answer the question of why it remains acceptable to them – presumably – for these jobs to be so poorly paid. They never explain how people are supposed to live and how that impacts on the wider economy. It's as though we've moved to a situation where some people feel that certain work (which they decide, of course) does not merit a living wage. How the hell did we get to such a state? |
Author: | peggy [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:43 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? | ||||
|
Author: | Kelvin's Ferret [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? |
Surely the real issue is that the majority of people are happy to consume from businesses that pay low wages because they charge less? If people boycotted these businesses and took their cash to those who paid higher wages, and consequnetly charged more to the consumer change would happen. If you care enough about it check whether places where you spend your money pay their employees what you consider to be acceptable, and if you don't care enough to make the effort then don't worry about it. |
Author: | West Leeds Rhino [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? |
Mintball wrote:We've had the same on here – people claiming that if others want decent pay, they can simply 'aspire' themselves into better-paid jobs. The same people never answer the question of why it remains acceptable to them – presumably – for these jobs to be so poorly paid. They never explain how people are supposed to live and how that impacts on the wider economy. It's as though we've moved to a situation where some people feel that certain work (which they decide, of course) does not merit a living wage. How the hell did we get to such a state? I think it stems from teachers telling kids to "do better or else they'll be cleaning toilets all their life". It's got to be cleaned by somebody and people should be paid correctly for doing so. It would be interesting to see what salaries would be if they were calculated in order of the jobs necessity. Some of the services sector could see a big reduction! |
Author: | bramleyrhino [ Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Asda price? |
I don't think comparing 'job for job' is the issue. There will always be a disparity in pay between jobs with low talent pools and high barriers to entry, and those with larger pools and lower barriers to entry - and there is nothing inherently wrong with that, providing that everyone can live to a resonable standard. The issue is that large businesses are paying so little that it is putting employees in a position where they find it impossible to live without state and/or charitable support. In the McDonalds example, the US taxpayer is subsidising McDonald's to the tune of $7bn in welfare programmes (presumably whatever the US equivilent of tax credits is). In the Wallmart example, it is easy to claim that the low-skilled shelf-stacker should have tried harder at school and he should count himself lucky to be earning $7.00ph, but it is (for some reason) much less popular to argue that four of the richest people on the planet shouldn't be expecting the state to subsidise their fortunes. |
Page 1 of 12 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |