WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Children In Need
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=539494		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Live Wired [ Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Children In Need
Coming soon on the BBC.

Do you feel comfortortable supporting a worthy cause on a service provider that has encouraged/ denied child abuse?

You pay your annual fee, is it right?
Author:  Big Graeme [ Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Live Wired wrote:Coming soon on the BBC.

Do you feel comfortortable supporting a worthy cause on a service provider that has encouraged/ denied child abuse?

You pay your annual fee, is it right?


If you ignore the Daily Mail hyperbole, encouraged FFS! then yes, people can both be appalled at what went on twenty years ago and what great work CiN does now.
If they can't they are planks.
Author:  Son of Les [ Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
No. Whatever has happened in the past taints the corporation for ever, and no amount of money raised can ever help anyone ever.

Stupid question.
Author:  Ferocious Aardvark [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Live Wired wrote:Coming soon on the BBC.

Do you feel comfortortable supporting a worthy cause on a service provider that has encouraged/ denied child abuse?

You pay your annual fee, is it right?

:STUPID:
My nomination for dumbest, most idiotic post of 2012. Whether you win or not - well done :CLAP:
Author:  Mintball [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
I think we should just point out the sheer hypocrisy of the Daily Mail on this entire issue, since it effectively encourages a spot of 'perving' over underage girls (and the occasional boy) and makes money out of it.
Author:  Standee [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Live Wired wrote:Coming soon on the BBC.

Do you feel comfortortable supporting a worthy cause on a service provider that has encouraged/ denied child abuse?

You pay your annual fee, is it right?


Can you point me in the direction of the "BBC guide to abusing children" or "alternative ways for viewers to win a Blue Peter badge" list?

what I do not feel comfortable with is a load of multi multi multi millionaires telling the general population about how donating "just £5" can change a childs life. So f'k off Bono and take Geldolff with you. As for you Wogan, you're an ameiable bloke, but stop the preaching.
Author:  WIZEB [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Standee wrote: So f'k off Bono and take Geldolff with you. As for you Wogan, you're an ameiable bloke, but stop the preaching.


You are this character, and I claim my £5. :lol:

Image
Author:  Big Graeme [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Standee wrote:what I do not feel comfortable with is a load of multi multi multi millionaires telling the general population about how donating "just £5" can change a childs life. So f'k off Bono and take Geldolff with you. As for you Wogan, you're an ameiable bloke, but stop the preaching.


Who is going to raise more money with an appeal, you or Bono?
Author:  Standee [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Big Graeme wrote:Who is going to raise more money with an appeal, you or Bono?


up to you, if you want to give your money away because some sanctamonious multi -millioanaire tells you to.

How much tax did U2 pay on their Zooropa tour again?
Author:  Big Graeme [ Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Children In Need
Standee wrote:up to you, if you want to give your money away because some sanctamonious multi -millioanaire tells you to.

How much tax did U2 pay on their Zooropa tour again?


It's a fairly simple question, who would get more donations you or Bono?

Anything else is a strawman.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/