"Strip away the acronyms and the charges against Barclays are straightforward. Its traders and senior management are accused of tampering with two key interest rates to bolster their own profits. And they apparently did this not once, but repeatedly over four years."
Why aren't people being arrested as I type this? A paltry fine from the FSA isn't right. It amounts to 10 days profit of Barclays bank. What is more fining the institution itself only hurts the shareholders not the perpetrators of the crime
If I defrauded anyone out of as few thousand quid I would be in the dock.
People need to do jail time for this but I doubt they will.
"Strip away the acronyms and the charges against Barclays are straightforward. Its traders and senior management are accused of tampering with two key interest rates to bolster their own profits. And they apparently did this not once, but repeatedly over four years."
Why aren't people being arrested as I type this? A paltry fine from the FSA isn't right. It amounts to 10 days profit of Barclays bank. What is more fining the institution itself only hurts the shareholders not the perpetrators of the crime
If I defrauded anyone out of as few thousand quid I would be in the dock.
People need to do jail time for this but I doubt they will.
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20 Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18
Joined: May 10 2002 Posts: 47951 Location: Die Metropole
How can you possibly compare this to areal crime – such as looting a bottle of water during last summer's riots – and suggest that those who got a little muddled at a bank should be punished in anything like the same way as a real criminal?
And the fine is a disgrace too: Barclays should be excused it – just as Goldman Sachs were excused a fine for something or other.
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller
"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 14395 Location: Chester
Mintball wrote:How can you possibly compare this to areal crime – such as looting a bottle of water during last summer's riots – and suggest that those who got a little muddled at a bank should be punished in anything like the same way as a real criminal?
And the fine is a disgrace too: Barclays should be excused it – just as Goldman Sachs were excused a fine for something or other.
Quite. And Bob Diamond is totally blameless as well. Why on earth should he have known how his bank set its LIBOR rate (which is a fundamental indicator of a banks financial health amongst other things)? Why on earth would he take an interest in that?
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20 Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
Was pondering starting a thread myself, but in the spirit of this thread I'm so annoyed that they can't be left to their own devices without being bothered by pesky things like morals and "the law". I'll happily donate my house and all its contents to Barclays to help them pay off the fine. Sterling chaps, every one.
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Interestingly and more peversely, the fine is levied by the FSA and paid by Barclays. The fines the FSA collect are then taken into account when setting the levies on the banks to pay for the functions of the FSA.
So this fine will be directly reflected by lower bank levies to police the banks. Effectively giving Barclays a discount on its fine.
You definitely couldn't make that one up
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
cod'ead wrote:Interestingly and more peversely, the fine is levied by the FSA and paid by Barclays. The fines the FSA collect are then taken into account when setting the levies on the banks to pay for the functions of the FSA.
So this fine will be directly reflected by lower bank levies to police the banks. Effectively giving Barclays a discount on its fine.
You definitely couldn't make that one up
Lol and if it turns out that they were all in on it and end up with similar fines they might end up as a direct offset to the levies. I'm also sure I heard from the FSA spokeswoman last night that they'd entered a no prosecution agreement with Barclays.
cod'ead wrote:Interestingly and more peversely, the fine is levied by the FSA and paid by Barclays. The fines the FSA collect are then taken into account when setting the levies on the banks to pay for the functions of the FSA.
So this fine will be directly reflected by lower bank levies to police the banks. Effectively giving Barclays a discount on its fine.
You definitely couldn't make that one up
Although to be fair Osborne is trying to get it paid to government to benefit taxpayers.
Apparently, no criminal act has been committed in terms of the FSMA. Personally, I find it hard to believe that there has not been a criminal act committed under other legislation (and if not, the law is an ass). Now, if a criminal act has been committed and the perpetrators benefitted financially (which from the allegations seems likely) then surely they could have their assets seized and be jailed under the Proceeds of Crime Act? It's about time this country got tough on this sort of thing.
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
From BBC
"London Inter Bank Offered Rate. The rate at which banks in London lend money to each other for the short-term in a particular currency. A new Libor rate is calculated every morning by financial data firm Thomson Reuters based on interest rates provided by members of the British Bankers Association."
So a private company (with no interest in making money ) is calculating interest rates by which other private companies (with an interest in making money) are then, er, making money. But the second company is providing duff info to the first for the calculations so that they benefit more. Sounds extremely dodgy to me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
) is calculating interest rates by which other private companies (
