WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Steve Coogaan "never sought fame"...
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=514104
Page 9 of 9

Author:  Chris28 [ Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Steve Coogaan "never sought fame"...

El Barbudo wrote:I read this morning about the Sun having printed a countdown to Charlotte Church's 16th birthday (the age of sexual consent).
I hadn't been aware of that .. another reason (if any more were needed) why I will never buy a copy of that rag or have any respect for its editor or proprietor.


I seem to recall hearing they did something similar for Emma "Hermione" Watson

Author:  Chris28 [ Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Steve Coogaan "never sought fame"...

Horatio Yed wrote:My main gripe is they can headline a paper with some complete ballcocks and then when made to apologise it's a tiny paragraph on page 37

I think that whatever page they 'lie' on should be the same page they apologise on and devote the same area, so one full page of lies = one full page apology



:CLAP: :CLAP:

Said pretty much the same myself yesterday while listening to Church give evidence

Author:  cod'ead [ Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Steve Coogaan "never sought fame"...

I don't think anyone would argue that the Press Complaints Commission has done a pretty shitty job at the self-regulation of UK newspapers, especially when you see that the publishers of the Express, Star and OK magazine no longer contribute to the funding and are effectively outside of its jurisdiction. We also have the laughable situation where Paul Dacre (Executive Editor of the Wail), is chair of the Editors' Code Committee - now that is like setting a fox among the chickens.

Unfortunately an independent body can never be truly independent, they will be appointed by politicians and then be subjected to all the wooing that the media barons have always undertaken. Perhaps a system of licensing could be introduced, alongside a system of penalty points, awarded for the various transgressions, whether brought before the courts or not. With financial penalties applied not just to the proprietors but also to the Executive Editors. Continued transgressions could then lead to further sanctions such as mandating a blank print run, where a newspaper must print and distribute a full edition, containing no advertising and nothing other than an apology, apart from the masthead. If a newspaper continues flouting the rules, then the ultimate sanction of suspension or revocation of the license could be applied.

Page 9 of 9 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/