JLM32 wrote:The only drivel here is from yourself. Do you really believe the people involved would go to such lengths to advance a cause, and then make it so easy for people like yourself to discover it wasn't genuine!? Get real!
Yes i certainly do..And You know what. I could provide 10 tonnes of proof in front of people like you, and if you're not ready to accept an idea, they will never accept the proof. No amount of evidence will suffice to prove anything, it is the jury that will decide, and you are the jury. So there you go, I pity your judgement.
This is no conspiracy theory. This is FACT right from the horse's mouth.
FLAT STANLEY wrote:Yes i certainly do..And You know what. I could provide 10 tonnes of proof in front of people like you, and if you're not ready to accept an idea, they will never accept the proof. No amount of evidence will suffice to prove anything, it is the jury that will decide, and you are the jury. So there you go, I pity your judgement.
This is no conspiracy theory. This is FACT right from the horse's mouth.
Oh no! How embarrassing! You tell me I haven't done enough research then you bring up a quote that was made up!
Watch the video, what he actually said was "The present window of opportunity which during a truly peaceful and interdependent might be built will not be open for too long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts."
Can I suggest that you actually start to do your research on normal websites and not the daily crackpot?
Joined: Dec 05 2001 Posts: 25122 Location: Aleph Green
In the days when there were myriad independent television news channels and newspaper owners it was practically impossible to hide major conspiracies (although like today most people tended to gravitate toward a very small number). But in the US right now there are now maybe four - possibly five television operators. And we all know how print media has been practically wiped out. The same has happened throughout the globe.
There's a very good book which has just been released by David Talbot called The Devil's Chessboard in which he discusses the life of the Dulles twins - Allan & John Foster who went on to become the head of the Central Intelligence Agency and the US State Department.
Anyone who doesn't believe that the media is little more than a tool for the Deep State should really take the time to read it. One of the chapters deals extensively with Operation Mockingbird - which essentially boiled down to placing hundreds of agents within newspapers and television channels whose job it was to control the flow of information fed to the public. Dulles even had a name for it - "The Mighty Wurlitzer". Given that Dulles openly admitted he modelled the CIA on MI5/6 during the days of William Stephenson (who Churchill codenamed "Intrepid") I think it's very unlikely the same does not function today.
In the days when there were myriad independent television news channels and newspaper owners it was practically impossible to hide major conspiracies (although like today most people tended to gravitate toward a very small number). But in the US right now there are now maybe four - possibly five television operators. And we all know how print media has been practically wiped out. The same has happened throughout the globe.
There's a very good book which has just been released by David Talbot called The Devil's Chessboard in which he discusses the life of the Dulles twins - Allan & John Foster who went on to become the head of the Central Intelligence Agency and the US State Department.
Anyone who doesn't believe that the media is little more than a tool for the Deep State should really take the time to read it. One of the chapters deals extensively with Operation Mockingbird - which essentially boiled down to placing hundreds of agents within newspapers and television channels whose job it was to control the flow of information fed to the public. Dulles even had a name for it - "The Mighty Wurlitzer". Given that Dulles openly admitted he modelled the CIA on MI5/6 during the days of William Stephenson (who Churchill codenamed "Intrepid") I think it's very unlikely the same does not function today.
Joined: Dec 05 2001 Posts: 25122 Location: Aleph Green
Just out of interest (I've been driving home) - have we now proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the lack of blood (or is it the profusion - I get confused?) emitting from some unknown leg wound (was a tourniquet applied - oh I forgot, we don't need those any more because shock will stem the flow before the patient bleeds out from an open femoral artery? ) proves that nothing untoward happened in Boston?
Joined: Dec 05 2001 Posts: 25122 Location: Aleph Green
As for whether it's possible for the French to have covered up unknown monkey business in Paris - are the events in question any more serious than what took place in Italy during the "Years of Lead" when none other than the Prime Minister, Aldo Moro, was gunned down in the streets, the Bologna train station was bombed (killing 85 and wounding hundreds) etc. etc.?
What eventually became known as "Operation Gladio" carried out by Licio Gelli, the P2 Masonic Lodge, Permindex etc. was very effectively blamed on the Left and used as a weapon to bludgeon them (which was the point from the very beginning).
I mean, it's people like JLM32 who'd be lampooning anyone for believing they weren't being told the truth. It's people like JLM32 who'd have you believe the Vietnamese attacked the United States in the Gulf of Tonkin - as well as countless other examples.
I think it's hilarious what lies these "howl at the moon" believeists tell themselves.
Mugwump wrote:Just out of interest (I've been driving home) - have we now proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the lack of blood (or is it the profusion - I get confused?) emitting from some unknown leg wound (was a tourniquet applied - oh I forgot, we don't need those any more because shock will stem the flow before the patient bleeds out from an open femoral artery? ) proves that nothing untoward happened in Boston?
Seriously, you can't make this stuff up!
Oh look who's back! Mr emoticon himself! Thought you were bored of me and had many better things to do. Another half truth and deflection attempt (You're good at these) What's really entertaining is how you continually deliberately miss the point. A Daily crackpot website quoted that as undeniable proof "The lack of blood proved the Boston Bombing was a hoax" I have simply proved that this is easily discredited, much like the large majority of the fruitcake section of society that see a hoax or set up in everything.
I would lambast everyone at stating that almost everything was a hoax without any real concrete proof, yes damn right I would. Oh yes, don't worry, I didn't miss your "I think it's very unlikely" Not a couple of hours after you had attempted to belittle one of my posts because it didn't give an exact figure in percentage! I sometimes can't make my mind up on here, if you're actually a parody account or just so wrapped up in your own self importance you don't notice the many gaping holes in what you say.
I'm still laughing about you preaching to us all on the Saints forum, that we would be changing our minds when Saints made Old Trafford again!
JLM32 wrote:Tw, The Boston Bombing-absolute proof " There was little or no blood coming from the alleged double amputee, it must have been a fake." However, it is widely agreed from top medical professionals, both Military and none Military that amputation suffered via blast trauma (Such as a bomb) Would very often cause the blood vessels to cauterise or if this doesn't occur shock causes the blood vessels to constrict or even cut off blood flow.
The supposed amputee's were legless before the actual firecracker went off, here is the actual footage no wonder there's no blood. watch for the limp.[urlhttps://youtu.be/M7N3EvGIkms][/url]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
) proves that nothing untoward happened in Boston?
