So we’re a long way away when it comes to offering refuge, but really quite close when emphasising the serious of the situation and the related importance of not changing our leader. As if having Johnson in charge helps one iota more than replacing him with Truss or Raab or a literal stuffed shirt.

Make it up as you go along why don't you, you must be desperate to try and score points, clearly those two are guilty they've admitted it on television last night and apologised and deserve whatever they get, where's your problem? it's the made up stuff you put on here I don't agree with, for example your first sentence in your post where according to you I'm still asking for evidence when I'm clearly not, I'm afraid if I've just been psychoanalysed by the untouchable holy ghost then your not very good at it

Yes it does stink a bit of desperation.

Oooh, you are now entering full Jackanory mode.

If you had been keeping up or, had a better memory, you would see that I had plenty of issues with Labour, especially under Corbyn.
Equally, you would see that The Tory honeymoon was only going to end when they stopped the pandemic spending and tried to claw back the £billions spent and right now, all of the Troy chickens are beginning to come home to roost.
Tax increases, roaring inflation, covid, lying Boris, and the Premier in waiting (Sunak) stuffed by leaks about his wife - which appear to have come from No 10
Lets' face it, there is little going right at the moment and the pretence that Britain is "leading" the war effort with Ukraine is all that you have.

The fact that all this is happening in the run up to local elections is just more "bad luck"

As for the electorate turning to the Liberals, it would still be a massive improvement on this set of self serving *****.

The distance argument is new even for WQ but what about Ireland they are still further away than the U.K. but they managed to admit more Ukrainians but they don’t have Pritti as their Home Secretary.
A forces expert yesterday pointed out that the political decision to send arms actually weakens our own defences because they come out of our reserves. The sending of armoured vehicles was also questioned because of the complicated nature of these vehicles we would have to send military personnel over to show how to repair them and operate the internal equipment.

There you go again I wonder how many on here believe your constant claims of neutrality. I know it’s an embarrassment to be a Conservative supporter but for once admit it rather than keep crying Wolf.

I am desperate for this farce to end. Nothing says desperation quite like me making the case for a Truss or Raab premiership!

The bag, along with its contents, which I used, on my dog walk this morning would have far more integrity than our current PM.
Yes, it did have a whiff about it but, unlike Bojo, I had trust in the bag.

WOW, is this how low your prepared to lower your standard of posting to show your bitterness, I really thought you were better than that, is there a competition on here for the most insulting post, because I think you would win it outright, you should be embarrassed seriously.

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:The distance argument is new even for WQ but what about Ireland they are still further away than the U.K. but they managed to admit more Ukrainians but they don’t have Pritti as their Home Secretary. A forces expert yesterday pointed out that the political decision to send arms actually weakens our own defences because they come out of our reserves. The sending of armoured vehicles was also questioned because of the complicated nature of these vehicles we would have to send military personnel over to show how to repair them and operate the internal equipment. Im astounded it needed a "forces expert" to state the obvious......but what i don't get is why you are highlighting this ? Should we not send arms if its detrimental to our own defences ? Is it not weakening every single donor countries defences by sending arms ? Also wonder if the "forces expert" was aware of the solution below in regards armoured vehicles..... https://www.forces.net/ukraine/news/ukr ... ehicles-uk

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:The distance argument is new even for WQ but what about Ireland they are still further away than the U.K. but they managed to admit more Ukrainians but they don’t have Pritti as their Home Secretary. A forces expert yesterday pointed out that the political decision to send arms actually weakens our own defences because they come out of our reserves. The sending of armoured vehicles was also questioned because of the complicated nature of these vehicles we would have to send military personnel over to show how to repair them and operate the internal equipment. Im astounded it needed a "forces expert" to state the obvious......but what i don't get is why you are highlighting this ? Should we not send arms if its detrimental to our own defences ? Is it not weakening every single donor countries defences by sending arms ? Also wonder if the "forces expert" was aware of the solution below in regards armoured vehicles..... https://www.forces.net/ukraine/news/ukr ... ehicles-uk