Him wrote:You mean like watch that people were mentioning? http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style ... 23264.html Or the IPad mini at £250? http://www.johnlewis.com/apple-ipad-min ... 8000030510 And that's without searching very hard. neither of which are £200 or less I think you should stick to re-runs of the Cannonball Run on Dave

Him wrote:You mean like watch that people were mentioning? http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style ... 23264.html Or the IPad mini at £250? http://www.johnlewis.com/apple-ipad-min ... 8000030510 And that's without searching very hard. neither of which are £200 or less I think you should stick to re-runs of the Cannonball Run on Dave

Who was slagging off Apple devices ?

Nobody. Standee is obviously a massive Apple fan boy and has been brainwashed by the incessant Apple marketing machine.

I thought he got a free iPhone from his lawyer for letting them do his whiplash claim. I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong.

Oh yeah I'm sorry one is £216 the other is £250.

Yeah that extra £16 is the really difficult bit to justify.

For once just admit you F'd up and thought they were all a lot more expensive.

So, what makes you think the people you tried to take the mick out of can't afford £216?

You can get a 32gb iPod Touch for 199 quid. 199 quid is less than 200. It is still an Apple device. If you want to save even more money you can get a 16gb iPod Touch for 159.

and you can take Video with?

Yup. An iPod Touch is pretty much an iPhone without the phone.

Think iPod Nano has video capability as well and they cost even less.