Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:08 pm
Stand-Offish
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 18 2006 Posts: 18610 Location: Somewhere in Bonny Donny (Twinned with Krakatoa in 1883).
Kosh wrote:This thread is pure comedy gold.
I love it when people with no idea about science try to 'debunk' scientific evidence. Hilarity ensues.
I personally see it as funny, but at the same time very sad. Sad that people have such a rubbish grasp of Science and can't or won't see the holes in their logic. Then as some kind of bizarre defence call scientific folk faithists. Faith has very little to do with it.
There is not a single poster on here that has tried to use Science to back up their mischief theories that has not made themselves look stupid and inadequate. Not one.
Get ready for a cap fitting session.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
As the sound cone of a sonic boom propagates perpendicular to the rocket, by the time it reached the ocean it would be several dozen miles away from the launch site, and such sound as did make it to sea level would be overwhelmed by the sound of the rocket engine.
But your idiot mentors who publish such drivel don't bother to even try to read up on the very basics of what a sonic boom is, or how it propagates, they're too busy weeing their pants cos they think they found yet another 'thing'. The only question is, how can you keep falling for it? How can you repeatedly humiliate yourself by being so endlessly gullible?
Poor Stan.
FLAT STANLEY wrote:Hahaha watch this very expensive Firework
Stan and his dopey mentors don't understand that rockets launch UPWARDS!
Taking the case of Apollo 11 on its way to the moon, it broke the sound barrier at an altitude of 7.96km or almost 5 miles.
As the sound cone of a sonic boom propagates perpendicular to the rocket, by the time it reached the ocean it would be several dozen miles away from the launch site, and such sound as did make it to sea level would be overwhelmed by the sound of the rocket engine.
But your idiot mentors who publish such drivel don't bother to even try to read up on the very basics of what a sonic boom is, or how it propagates, they're too busy weeing their pants cos they think they found yet another 'thing'. The only question is, how can you keep falling for it? How can you repeatedly humiliate yourself by being so endlessly gullible?
Poor Stan.
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:53 am
tedglen
International Star
Joined: Jan 31 2012 Posts: 323
Thank Goodness this thread is up and running again, and my fears that the X Files new series had replaced all conspiracy theories on here, are unfounded. I was beginning to miss my daily 'fix'.
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 4:35 pm
Stand-Offish
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 18 2006 Posts: 18610 Location: Somewhere in Bonny Donny (Twinned with Krakatoa in 1883).
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:How you must have laughed then at the Challenger disaster. And I suppose Columbia disintegrating on re-entry cracked you up too.
Nice.
And Apollo 13 not going to plan. Can you imagine rubbish hoaxes like these, that don't really work? Except of course it is all planned to make the real hoaxes more believable. I mean, in the hoax mastermind's devious brain it wouldn't do to have all hoaxes running perfectly would it? Who would fall for them? Gotta have a few go wrong to prove the rule. So Stan is not fooled by these exceptions... no way! They are all hoaxes ... everything in life is a fooking hoax ... everything! Apart, of course, from religion.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:46 pm
FLAT STANLEY
Club Captain
Joined: Nov 09 2015 Posts: 829
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:How you must have laughed then at the Challenger disaster. .
The so called Challenger disaster is a prime example of NASA's deceitfulness. The crew wasn't even on board that mission there's plenty of evidence out in the field with regards to the Actornaughts still living today. NASA always fake their entry/re-entry missions. Nothing escapes the firmament.
To the people saying why fake the deaths and the explosion, well that firework/rocket wasn't supposed to explode. This was going to be a typical NASA hoax where they send a firework/rocket up and out of sight and then lie and say they are on the shuttle. Once it blew up they were screwed. They couldn't say "oh everyone survived and is perfectly okay", so they had to just hide the teachers for a while until everyone forgot and then sent them back out to teach. The rocket wasn't supposed to explode. That's how we know fireworks/rockets are totally unmanned and remote controlled. Simples
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 923 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
