tigertot wrote:Yup, you can't argue with facts; https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/thre ... -z8g8m9vp2 Quite correct you can’t argue with the facts. In the interest of fairness/balance I presume you will be furnishing everybody with the labour councils that are incompetent.

tigertot wrote:Yup, you can't argue with facts; https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/thre ... -z8g8m9vp2 Quite correct you can’t argue with the facts. In the interest of fairness/balance I presume you will be furnishing everybody with the labour councils that are incompetent.

Why do I need to? I am not generally a Labour voter, nor are Labour in power, nor have I made inaccurate statements about Tory spending.

I haven’t suggested you have made inaccurate statements. You have highlighted Tory councils, so I thought in the interest of fairness you may wish to highlight some labour councils. How you vote is no concern of mine.

Again, why should I? I was responding to yet another inaccurate & unsubstantiated post. You provide the balance if you can show examples.

It clearly is.

How do you arrive to that conclusion.

Because it is a Socialist who thinks anyone with a few quid should pay for the idiots.

And it's a Tory that think's its ok to screw over the poor whilst avoiding their own tax obligations

poor people are poor due to lack of ambission, sitting on the pity pot blaming everyone/thing else.

Great input, Norman. Have you got any spare bikes for the poor?