Your argument is quite ridiculous even for you because what you are saying is because it was not identified at the time it cannot be true. I guess if as you believe they have nothing to answer for then they would be open to being investigated. I think you are in a minority if you believe it did not take place plus the story was in the Mirror. I will ask you if the party did take place thereby breaching the law are you happy for them to get away with it when the majority adhered to the restrictions and those that didn’t received the appropriate punishment. I think you truly believe you don’t mind being lied to so can I just say your intelligence is boundless and we should prostrate ourselves at the magnitude of your intellect on all subjects.
Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:Your argument is quite ridiculous even for you because what you are saying is because it was not identified at the time it cannot be true. I guess if as you believe they have nothing to answer for then they would be open to being investigated. I think you are in a minority if you believe it did not take place plus the story was in the Mirror. I will ask you if the party did take place thereby breaching the law are you happy for them to get away with it when the majority adhered to the restrictions and those that didn’t received the appropriate punishment. I think you truly believe you don’t mind being lied to so can I just say your intelligence is boundless and we should prostrate ourselves at the magnitude of your intellect on all subjects.
The Ghost of '99 wrote:So once again you're not interested in holding the government to account. I'm shocked I tell you.
I'm not interested in gossip put out by biased rags with only one aim in mind if that helps, tell me this then squire, how come it's just suddenly appeared 12 month after the alleged offence quite conveniently, maybe they've exhausted all other avenues of attempting to embarrass the government, come back with your proof when you have it, somebody with your capabilities should have little difficulty on that score.
Yes The Sun and The Times are "biased rags" against the government
Even the Telegraph has covered this story.
If you're looking for a safe space that will only report positive news on the regime have you thought about maybe relocating to North Korea? Or maybe just only watch GB News if the real news is too much for you to bear.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
The Ghost of '99 wrote:Yes The Sun and The Times are "biased rags" against the government
Even the Telegraph has covered this story.
If you're looking for a safe space that will only report positive news on the regime have you thought about maybe relocating to North Korea? Or maybe just only watch GB News if the real news is too much for you to bear.
Couldn't give a toss whose covered it, one simple question has anyone come up with any proof that there was anything inappropriate taking place, if it wasn't for you and your mates it would be dead now, because there doesn't seem to be much interest anywhere else, and yes I'm only looking for positive news choose where it comes from whether it be from North Korea or any other country aren't you?, or do you just like to get into pointless arguments for the sake of it to fulfil your empty life, as for living in the real world, I'm glad I don't live in yours
chissitt wrote:Couldn't give a toss whose covered it, one simple question has anyone come up with any proof that there was anything inappropriate taking place, if it wasn't for you and your mates it would be dead now, because there doesn't seem to be much interest anywhere else, and yes I'm only looking for positive news choose where it comes from whether it be from North Korea or any other country aren't you?, or do you just like to get into pointless arguments for the sake of it to fulfil your empty life, as for living in the real world, I'm glad I don't live in yours
You called them "biased rags", and it was legitimately pointed out to you that rather than biased they are long established staunchly pro Conservative newspapers. Generally speaking if the government of the day is getting negative press in their core supporting publications I think that's worthy of talking about.
Pumpetypump wrote:You called them "biased rags", and it was legitimately pointed out to you that rather than biased they are long established staunchly pro Conservative newspapers. Generally speaking if the government of the day is getting negative press in their core supporting publications I think that's worthy of talking about.
You squire are falling into the trap of your biased mates, just because I don't agree with the stuff printed in the labour backed newspapers, does not mean I agree with what's printed in the Tory backed newspapers I have no leanings towards any party, each to their own and if you want to talk about anything newsworthy then by all means fill yer boots, frankly along with politicians I find newspaper reporters contemptable and usually with an agenda behind anything political where they can get a story out of it to suit, hope that clears it up some what for you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum