Suffice to say SOMETHING is screwing around in craft which have been observed not just on earth but loitering in several regions of the inner solar system. There are just too many cases and despite what others would have us believe - people are pretty good at recalling memories - especially when they coincide with stressful situations.

If you read the Rendalsham report they admit the existence of not just UFOs but UFOs which interact with observers. The clever bit (which I suspect is to do with tricking people launching FOIA requests) is they don't CALL them UFOs.

One of the interesting things I noticed which seems to tie up with another phenomenon I never really bothered with is the design layout of this supposed electro-gravitic drive fitted inside the TR-3B.

Those people who claim to have seen it have counted exactly the same number of spokes which were noticed in the very first crop circles.

Over 95% of crop circles I'm positive are fake. But their relatively sudden appearance and the subsequent explosion of copy-cat instances always confused me.

I can understand people doing it as a bit of a craze. Maybe even some kind of art statement. But it strikes me as the kind of thing you'd very quickly become bored with. Who wants to tramp around a farmer's field every day with a plank of wood?

Given that they seem to be the product of a very small number of people I now suspect they are largely meant to divert people's attention. Recall that early crop circles very often left an imprint which could be seen in the next year's crop. Moreover, many people claim to have experienced weird electrical phenomena when standing at their centre.

But it's the fact that the number of spokes in these early circles appears to match precisely the number of inlaid alloy spokes reported as existing in the base of this electro-gravitic drive which interests me. It's certainly possible that a charged, rotating plasma field could interact with whatever sits below it. We know that the US routinely based many of its most advanced spy-planes in the UK (such as the U2 & the SR-71). So it's certainly possible they'd base a craft of this specification here too.

Why would a plasma powered vehicle routinely land in fields of crops at dead of night, though?

The first part of your quote is correct. Those planes were based in the UK at various points. The second half is wrong though. The US would never put any experimental aircraft or technology outside of the USA. They would put aircraft that weren't experimental, something 'in service' abroad but nothing experimental. Countries tend to keep its investments and secrets within its own borders at early stages. I was a Military Intelligence Analyst and worked in the most sensitive Military areas in the UK including the American bases. The truth is a lot less sensational than some seem to make out. There simply isn't any experimental aircraft in the UK from any nation. We're too broke as a nation to invest in such things and the US only bases in service aircraft over here, and has only ever done so. Aircraft such as the U2 were 'secret' in the loosest sense of the word, but were not experimental in any way. The first U2 came into service in 1957 after being 'experimental' for two years.

Plasma drives and crop circles may have validity in some other area but they certainly have no validity within the UK military or UK based US military. They simply don't exist in that context.

This thread must sit in the top 3 of all topics for the highest average number of words per post.

Interesting article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35411684

Interesting article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35411684

American rapper BoB continues feud with scientist Neil Tyson over crackpot 'flat Earth' theory. Because internet.

American rapper BoB continues feud with scientist Neil Tyson over crackpot 'flat Earth' theory. Because internet.

Wheels wrote:American rapper BoB continues feud with scientist Neil Tyson over crackpot 'flat Earth' theory. Because internet. Not a great contest. Delusional rap 'artist' vs Astrophysicist on the subject of the earth being flat. Of course, you risk inviting RLFans very own delusional to cast blinkered judgement and deflect reality and facts like he was made of anti-rational teflon. Don't say I didn't warn you...

Wheels wrote:American rapper BoB continues feud with scientist Neil Tyson over crackpot 'flat Earth' theory. Because internet. Not a great contest. Delusional rap 'artist' vs Astrophysicist on the subject of the earth being flat. Of course, you risk inviting RLFans very own delusional to cast blinkered judgement and deflect reality and facts like he was made of anti-rational teflon. Don't say I didn't warn you...

Typical Darwinians bristle with rage and snarl, and engage in absurd ad hominem attacks as they impotently fight tooth and nail for the survival of their unnaturally selected Religion

BOOM!

Unlike the magic man in the sky, he appears!

Yeah, I'm frothing and dripping sweat and bile in an incredible rage! Pffft...

You just can't resist letting your little fingers tap out fantasies.