Joined: Nov 23 2009 Posts: 12749 Location: The Hamptons of East Yorkshire
IR80 wrote:StIll waitong for Blair to face trial....
How about that old slag Thatcher for creating an underclass in our society that will never go away now? I'd dig her up and have her in the dock along with Phoney Tony.
In other news - I'm happy to report that after an extensive international procurement exercise involving me, my online financial specialists, Walmart and a specialist distribution operative, I took delivery of 4,000 pieces of PPE; prior to the Tory rebranding, traditionally and perhaps colloquially known as ordering a 4 pack of bog rolls off of Asda.
bren2k wrote:In other news - I'm happy to report that after an extensive international procurement exercise involving me, my online financial specialists, Walmart and a specialist distribution operative, I took delivery of 4,000 pieces of PPE; prior to the Tory rebranding, traditionally and perhaps colloquially known as ordering a 4 pack of bog rolls off of Asda.
8,000 pieces if it's 2-ply. Your cup runneth over if it's 3-ply.
"Back home we got a taxidermy man. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him."
Last edited by King Street Cat on Tue Apr 28, 2020 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:Who keeps arming Saudi Arabia, who kept supporting South Africa during apartheid and who treated a known dictator and murderer of his own people.
Whilst ever we manufacture arms/ships/aircraft/tanks i.e. items used in warfare we have to sell them to somebody - not sure we can sell it all to Switzerland?
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Sal Paradise wrote:Whilst ever we manufacture arms/ships/aircraft/tanks i.e. items used in warfare we have to sell them to somebody - not sure we can sell it all to Switzerland?
Do we really ??
Yes, manufacturing these items would mean that we COULD sell them to other nations but it doesn't mean that we HAVE to ?? We could just produce equipment for our own armed forces and not feel that we have to supply other nations / groups.
Of course there can be deals done to reciprocate the supply of arms but, when we begin to offer such things to "unstable" governments / nations, there is always the danger that they will be used either against us or against our allies. The only reason that some of these things are sold to "dodgy" organisations is to make money.
Yes, manufacturing these items would mean that we COULD sell them to other nations but it doesn't mean that we HAVE to ?? We could just produce equipment for our own armed forces and not feel that we have to supply other nations / groups.
Of course there can be deals done to reciprocate the supply of arms but, when we begin to offer such things to "unstable" governments / nations, there is always the danger that they will be used either against us or against our allies. The only reason that some of these things are sold to "dodgy" organisations is to make money.
Not the only reason surely. There are the 135k quality jobs and that's just those directly employed. How many would be lost if we stopped exports?
wotsupcas wrote:Not the only reason surely. There are the 135k quality jobs and that's just those directly employed. How many would be lost if we stopped exports?
And there is the conundrum.
If we are saying that there has to be that number of employees within the industry, to enable us to arm and protect ourselves and the consequence of that is that there will be "X" spare capacity, then a decision has to be made as to whether to allow the excess "stock" to be sold elsewhere and how to control those sales or, should the industry be "shrunk", in order to prevent having to "chase" sales to "dodgy" customers.
You would think where the supply of arms is concerned, it should be on a defence and safety remit and not just selling additional arms because we have over capacity ??
If we are saying that there has to be that number of employees within the industry, to enable us to arm and protect ourselves and the consequence of that is that there will be "X" spare capacity, then a decision has to be made as to whether to allow the excess "stock" to be sold elsewhere and how to control those sales or, should the industry be "shrunk", in order to prevent having to "chase" sales to "dodgy" customers.
You would think where the supply of arms is concerned, it should be on a defence and safety remit and not just selling additional arms because we have over capacity ??
So if you were in charge how many of those people would you sack? And therein lies the problem. I wish, like you, that it was a perfect world without the need for arms. But it isn't and if we don't sell them someone else will.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
