Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:09 pm
FLAT STANLEY
Club Captain
Joined: Nov 09 2015 Posts: 829
Here is a typical mast. With regards to Sky TV being analogue transmitted here is the proof that nails FA's diarrhea. As you can see Analogue signals are not obsolete. Your freeview box or Sky box transforms the analogue signal to Digital. Now i'm not saying Sky and Freeview carry the same analogue band. They both receive different frequency bands. Here is another piece of evidence Satellite signals are Analogue. Satellites don't exist. Now you show me true authentic photo evidence of your satellite.I await more CGI Ad Hominem verbal Diarrhea.
Here is a typical mast. With regards to Sky TV being analogue transmitted here is the proof that nails FA's diarrhea. As you can see Analogue signals are not obsolete. Your freeview box or Sky box transforms the analogue signal to Digital. Now i'm not saying Sky and Freeview carry the same analogue band. They both receive different frequency bands. Here is another piece of evidence Satellite signals are Analogue. Satellites don't exist. Now you show me true authentic photo evidence of your satellite.I await more CGI Ad Hominem verbal Diarrhea.
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:20 pm
FLAT STANLEY
Club Captain
Joined: Nov 09 2015 Posts: 829
Is that it. : Thats not photographic. Thats just a friggin list. How pathetically embarrassingSign of a loser rearranging my posts. Satellites are now in the coffin
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:41 pm
Ferocious Aardvark
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
Your pisspoor response is what is "pathetically embarrassing". You continue to make an utter fool of yourself.
You claim to want to see satellites for yourself, if they exist.
There is NO image ANYONE could EVER provide to you, which you would EVER accept, unless it fitted your bizarre beliefs. But the direct evidence of your own eyes would, if you are sane, and not a troll, be all you needed.
So, you could see loads of satellites, if you only wanted to. I have merely provided you with the tools. But I already knew you dare not use them, for fear of having to swallow your pride and admit your error to yourself. Everyone knew you would bluster and swerve the issue. You really are a laughing stock.
That's your problem, but there's the list, you need only look up into the sky. Couldn't make it any easier for you.
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:51 pm
FLAT STANLEY
Club Captain
Joined: Nov 09 2015 Posts: 829
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:Your pisspoor response is what is "pathetically embarrassing". You continue to make an utter fool of yourself. You claim to want to see satellites for yourself, if they exist..
I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:38 pm
TheButcher
International Board Member
Joined: Jul 13 2003 Posts: 5594
FLAT STANLEY wrote:I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...
No you didn't.
...Diagnosing SBD (Sporting Bipolar Disorder) since 2003... Negs bringing down the tone of your forum? Keyboard Bell-endery tiresome? Embarrassed by some of your own fans? Then you need... TheButcher I must be STOPPED!! Vice Chairman of The Scarlet Turkey Clique Grand Wizard Shill of Nibiru Prime & Dark Globe Champion Chairman of 'The Neil Barker School for gifted Clowns' "A Local Forum. For Local People"
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:43 pm
Stand-Offish
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 18 2006 Posts: 18610 Location: Somewhere in Bonny Donny (Twinned with Krakatoa in 1883).
FLAT STANLEY wrote:I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...
I doubt you have ever actually proved anything of a scientific nature in your life. You might have proved bread ....
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Post subject: Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:11 pm
Ferocious Aardvark
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
FLAT STANLEY wrote:I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence.
In your head. Utter nonsense, which you (or anyone with a working satellite dish) can debunk in an instant by obstructing the line of sight to the satellites, while leaving all the rest of the dish's view including the whole of the visible planet, unobstructed.
FLAT STANLEY wrote:How can i be the fool.
How can you be the fool? Let me count the ways ...
FLAT STANLEY wrote: If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...
1. I can't provide you with a satellite as they tend to be a tad on the expensive side for my wallet.
2. If in your head you are convinced you provided me "a authentic Satellite in working order", where did you get it from, given you say they don't exist?
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum