Dally wrote:Well, I don't know Mrs M's precise definition - but it will inlude housing, pensions, medical, welfare, education, etc
Will it? So it includes both public and private spending on such issues then?
Dally wrote:GDP per capita is a good proxy to wealth.
Not necessarily. For instance the GDP for producing Nissan cars in Sunderland is counted in the UK's GDP figures. Yet the profits of that aren't necessarily going to British people. GDP and GDP per capita are rendered fairly irrelevant due to globalisation. They give an indication but it is only an indication and needs other factors and indicators taken into account. Such as income inequality. China being a good example of that.
Dally wrote:If Europe has 7% of the world's population and 25% of its GDP it does not take a genius to work out that its per capita GDP is many times the world's average. If you have ever travelled outside Europe you would have seen that too. It's not rocket science.
Very nice.
Dally wrote:As to spending, as was widely reported earlier in the week the OECD issued its findings on education across 65 countries.
Which, due to numerous factors including types of government, levels of international co-operation and cultural and specific differences is almost impossible to compare.
Dally wrote:Our 15 year olds' performance was 26th in Maths, 23rd in reading, 21st in science. Our average percapita spend for 6-15 year old education was 17.6% over the OECD average spend
I'd love to know how they worked that out. Since our public education system isn't split that way, our own government doesn't split education spending figures that way.
But even according to the actual OECD figures, the UK is 13th out of the 32 OECD countries that they've provided proper figures for spending per student on primary, secondary and secondary non-tertiary education core services. What bumps us up the spending table is ancillary services. The OECD average spend is irrelevant.
Dally wrote:whereas our per capita GDP was only 4.6% above. Our spend was the 11th highest per child but as noted above their proficiency was less than 11th in all three categories. So, seems like our kids are inherently thick or money is not been wisely spent.
Only if you think every nation is the same, gives the same information, has the same problems or the same priorities.
Did you also miss the parts where UK students had moved up the tables?