This is one of the major topics that should be decided the general election in this country. If one of the parties had a proper plan for removing these loop holes and generating many billions of additional tax revenue, they'd get my vote. Instead we're faced with debates on whether UKIP are suitable to represent the country and how labour are taking back the working class.
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
I don't think they need a plan, as I understand it the HMRC could assess tax bills on Vodafone or anyone, and leave them to pay and then appeal. The question to me is why they don't. Given that they hold the ultimate card of being able to enact into law, retrospectively, any loophole a court might find anyway.
A cynic might suggest that they are all mates together and will do alright out of it, in one way or another.
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 26578 Location: On the set of NEDS...
Saddened! wrote:This is one of the major topics that should be decided the general election in this country. If one of the parties had a proper plan for removing these loop holes and generating many billions of additional tax revenue, they'd get my vote. Instead we're faced with debates on whether UKIP are suitable to represent the country and how labour are taking back the working class.
Pretty much spot on, the whole tax system needs an overhaul from top to bottom, sadly no one will, far too many jobs for the boys in both directions.
Sad to see that from the days of a socially responsible employer like The Boots Pure Drug Company, we now get to the British taxpayer subsidising the finance required to leverage a buyout
Sad to see that from the days of a socially responsible employer like The Boots Pure Drug Company, we now get to the British taxpayer subsidising the finance required to leverage a buyout
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
I try to boycott them. Since they became private equity owned I have no time for them. We use a local, independent pharmacist. As to the rest of the junk they sell, you can get it elsewhere.
Daveo. What Vodafone is doing is nothing like tax avoidance so don't compare them to Gary Barlow. Vodafone do not have to enter a scheme number on their CT600 as there is no scheme, Gary Barlow will have had to disclose the scheme. Vodafone are doing nothing wrong. I bet there are self employed people on here complaining about Vodafone, yet who will do cash in hand jobs. Good on Vodafone I say. They are a plc and whilst they have to consider all stakeholders, the main aim of a plc is to increase shareholder wealth which is what it is doing, I don't see the problem
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Lebron James wrote:Daveo. What Vodafone is doing is nothing like tax avoidance so don't compare them to Gary Barlow. Vodafone do not have to enter a scheme number on their CT600 as there is no scheme, Gary Barlow will have had to disclose the scheme. Vodafone are doing nothing wrong. I bet there are self employed people on here complaining about Vodafone, yet who will do cash in hand jobs. Good on Vodafone I say. They are a plc and whilst they have to consider all stakeholders, the main aim of a plc is to increase shareholder wealth which is what it is doing, I don't see the problem
Regards
King James
So you are comfortable with the fact that companies can get away with paying zero corporation tax while upwards of 1,000,000 UK citizens (some of whom are possibly employed by the same companies) are relying on foodbanks and taxpayer subsidies to sustain them?
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
cod'ead wrote:So you are comfortable with the fact that companies can get away with paying zero corporation tax while upwards of 1,000,000 UK citizens (some of whom are possibly employed by the same companies) are relying on foodbanks and taxpayer subsidies to sustain them?
maybe they should be better at budgeting and not expect a free ride?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum