JerryChicken wrote:When you apply real-life financial rules to the idea of a private company running a free public school using public finances, then it really has no long term future does it ?
Well exactly. It makes no sense for free public schools to have to turn a profit and it therefore makes no sense for private companies to run them. Even fee paying public schools tend to rely on charitable status or they may also be unsustainable as the fees would be even higher.
Quote:Try and equate that to a business model totally dependent on public funding which is fixed and will not vary from one year to the next other than for inflation, how do you increase your profit margin in subsequent years ?
Because in this country the ordinary taxpayer will pay. I predict we will see the same kind of "privatising profit, socialising the debt" we saw with the bank bailouts if what happened in Sweden happened here.
This government would not allow what happened in Sweden to occur. The private companies would be seen like banks in that they would not be allowed to fail as there is no way Gove would want such a thing tarnishing his pet project.
Now some might say that would be a good thing because it would mean the students wouldn't suffer the disruption that follows when the company that provided their education went bust. But it would not be because in order for the companies to be sustained we will have to pay through nose so they remain profitable and indeed not only that but as you mentioned actually offer the prospect of growth.
Free schools run by for-profit companies is a totally bonkers idea. So Gove will most likely go for it and put in place mechanisms to socialise the debt if any of them do go bust.